Figure S2. Comparison of mutations called by the current protocol versus cBioportal ( http://www.cbioportal.org ). The total number of mutations called by the current protocol (in blue) is comparable to the mutations called from cBioportal (in orange) across all three classifications of breast cancer subtype (PDF 425 kb
Figure S2. Comparison of biological pathway between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) The perce...
Figure S1. Comparison of somatic mutation frequency between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) T...
Comparison of the frequency of select mutational events in breast cancer tumours versus cell lines. ...
Figure S11. Kaplan-Meier estimates based on mutation burden and neoepitope load. KS curves of (A) di...
Figure S1. Frequently mutated genes in TCGA breast cancer data. Here we show the mo for: (A) ER/PR(+...
Figure S3. Correlation of number of potential binding neoepitopes with number of nonsynonymous mutat...
Table S1. Number of patients for breast cancer subtype in the TCGA dataset according to IHC status. ...
Figure S5. Expressed neoepitopes (FPKM≥5) in subtypes of breast cancer. The range of expressed neoep...
Figure S9. Kaplan-Meier estimates for high and low mutation burden. KM survival curves are shown for...
Figure S4. Length of potential binding neoepitopes in breast cancer. The number of potential binding...
Figure S6. Correlation of number of potential binding neoepitopes with number of expressed (FPKM≥2) ...
Figure S10. Kaplan-Meier estimates by neoepitope load. KM curves of (A) disease-free survival and (B...
Figure S8. Distribution of neoepitopes binding to HLA class I alleles in the three subtypes of breas...
Table S3. Number of neoepitopes predicted for HLA class I alleles in all the breast cancer samples a...
Figure S7. Expression analysis for the high affinity neoepitopes (FPKM ≥2). (A) The number of the ex...
Figure S2. Comparison of biological pathway between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) The perce...
Figure S1. Comparison of somatic mutation frequency between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) T...
Comparison of the frequency of select mutational events in breast cancer tumours versus cell lines. ...
Figure S11. Kaplan-Meier estimates based on mutation burden and neoepitope load. KS curves of (A) di...
Figure S1. Frequently mutated genes in TCGA breast cancer data. Here we show the mo for: (A) ER/PR(+...
Figure S3. Correlation of number of potential binding neoepitopes with number of nonsynonymous mutat...
Table S1. Number of patients for breast cancer subtype in the TCGA dataset according to IHC status. ...
Figure S5. Expressed neoepitopes (FPKM≥5) in subtypes of breast cancer. The range of expressed neoep...
Figure S9. Kaplan-Meier estimates for high and low mutation burden. KM survival curves are shown for...
Figure S4. Length of potential binding neoepitopes in breast cancer. The number of potential binding...
Figure S6. Correlation of number of potential binding neoepitopes with number of expressed (FPKM≥2) ...
Figure S10. Kaplan-Meier estimates by neoepitope load. KM curves of (A) disease-free survival and (B...
Figure S8. Distribution of neoepitopes binding to HLA class I alleles in the three subtypes of breas...
Table S3. Number of neoepitopes predicted for HLA class I alleles in all the breast cancer samples a...
Figure S7. Expression analysis for the high affinity neoepitopes (FPKM ≥2). (A) The number of the ex...
Figure S2. Comparison of biological pathway between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) The perce...
Figure S1. Comparison of somatic mutation frequency between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) T...
Comparison of the frequency of select mutational events in breast cancer tumours versus cell lines. ...