Differences in average values of shape indices depending on the staining technique in comparison with unstained sperm.</p
The very low cut-off value for sperm morphology of 4% morphologically normal spermatozoa, as propose...
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = number of samples used. a ≠ b (<i>P</i> = 0.002); a ≠ c (<i...
<p>Sperm head length (A), sperm head width (B), midpiece length (C), and tail length (D). Individual...
Differences in means for morphometric parameters between each of the staining techniques and unstain...
Comparison in conventional sperm parameters before and after semen processing in the different studi...
Morphometric parameters of the sperm head, shape indices and conversion formulas by Maree et al. [4]...
Differences in staining index by malignancy grade (p-values, 2-tailed exact values from Mann-Whitney...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± SE. Superscripts A, B, C, and D indicate significant differences bet...
a,b<p>Within each column, differences between NS and SXY groups (P≤0.05).</p><p>Values are an averag...
<p>Mean ± standard error of different cell category obtained from different stain type, in bases of ...
<p>A. The relationship between the NSMR and body weight from c-IVF cycle. B. The relationship betwee...
Comparison of the testes’ parameters on the hydrocele and normal sides in 138 patients.</p
<p>Percentages of viable spermatozoa are based on dual SYBR14 (live sperm) and PI (dead sperm) label...
It is already well established that the percentage of normal sperm and specific sperm abnormalities ...
Background Assessment of sperm morphology (including morphometry) is extensively used to determine o...
The very low cut-off value for sperm morphology of 4% morphologically normal spermatozoa, as propose...
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = number of samples used. a ≠ b (<i>P</i> = 0.002); a ≠ c (<i...
<p>Sperm head length (A), sperm head width (B), midpiece length (C), and tail length (D). Individual...
Differences in means for morphometric parameters between each of the staining techniques and unstain...
Comparison in conventional sperm parameters before and after semen processing in the different studi...
Morphometric parameters of the sperm head, shape indices and conversion formulas by Maree et al. [4]...
Differences in staining index by malignancy grade (p-values, 2-tailed exact values from Mann-Whitney...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± SE. Superscripts A, B, C, and D indicate significant differences bet...
a,b<p>Within each column, differences between NS and SXY groups (P≤0.05).</p><p>Values are an averag...
<p>Mean ± standard error of different cell category obtained from different stain type, in bases of ...
<p>A. The relationship between the NSMR and body weight from c-IVF cycle. B. The relationship betwee...
Comparison of the testes’ parameters on the hydrocele and normal sides in 138 patients.</p
<p>Percentages of viable spermatozoa are based on dual SYBR14 (live sperm) and PI (dead sperm) label...
It is already well established that the percentage of normal sperm and specific sperm abnormalities ...
Background Assessment of sperm morphology (including morphometry) is extensively used to determine o...
The very low cut-off value for sperm morphology of 4% morphologically normal spermatozoa, as propose...
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = number of samples used. a ≠ b (<i>P</i> = 0.002); a ≠ c (<i...
<p>Sperm head length (A), sperm head width (B), midpiece length (C), and tail length (D). Individual...
DOI
Add to ORKG