Differences in staining index by malignancy grade (p-values, 2-tailed exact values from Mann-Whitney U tests).</p
<p>Mann-Whitney test demonstrates a significant difference (p<0.0001) in the comparison of the ΔCVF ...
Comparison of mean reference ELISA index values (IVs) between individuals who had true positive vs. ...
<p>The table shows the results of multiple Mann-Whitney tests to test for significant differences in...
Differences in average values of shape indices depending on the staining technique in comparison wit...
<p>Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test <i>p</i> values for the difference in prediction scores between autoso...
<p>Comparison of Pathologist H-scoring between conditions for all tested biomarkers.</p
<p>The Mann-Whitney U test was used for pair-wise comparisons in analyses of tumor grade and Kruskal...
<p>Mann-Whitney U test of differences between the study and the comparison group.</p
<p>The levels of the makers identified by the multivariate analysis were assessed by average spectra...
The Mann-Whitney U test (M.W.) analysis reflects the significant differences between mutated groups ...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Sign...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Sign...
<p>p-values for the comparison of δ<sub>3D-4D</sub> between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcino...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Sign...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Shap...
<p>Mann-Whitney test demonstrates a significant difference (p<0.0001) in the comparison of the ΔCVF ...
Comparison of mean reference ELISA index values (IVs) between individuals who had true positive vs. ...
<p>The table shows the results of multiple Mann-Whitney tests to test for significant differences in...
Differences in average values of shape indices depending on the staining technique in comparison wit...
<p>Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test <i>p</i> values for the difference in prediction scores between autoso...
<p>Comparison of Pathologist H-scoring between conditions for all tested biomarkers.</p
<p>The Mann-Whitney U test was used for pair-wise comparisons in analyses of tumor grade and Kruskal...
<p>Mann-Whitney U test of differences between the study and the comparison group.</p
<p>The levels of the makers identified by the multivariate analysis were assessed by average spectra...
The Mann-Whitney U test (M.W.) analysis reflects the significant differences between mutated groups ...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Sign...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Sign...
<p>p-values for the comparison of δ<sub>3D-4D</sub> between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcino...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Sign...
The log2 fold change of each parameter was compared. The comparisons’ p-values are shown above. Shap...
<p>Mann-Whitney test demonstrates a significant difference (p<0.0001) in the comparison of the ΔCVF ...
Comparison of mean reference ELISA index values (IVs) between individuals who had true positive vs. ...
<p>The table shows the results of multiple Mann-Whitney tests to test for significant differences in...
DOI
Add to ORKG