Add to ORKGPublic Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-origin labeling (COOL) for beef, lamb, pork, fish, perishable agricultural commodities (fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables) and peanuts. While a goal of this law was to benefit domestic consumers by allowing them to make informed consumption decisions, the effects of COOL on the interest groups involved have been the subject of a heated on-going debate
Concerns over the total costs assessed to the beef industry from the implementation of mandatory cou...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Federal law requires most imports, including many food items, to bear labels informing the “ultimate...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
This study provides a new framework of analysis of the market and welfare effects of mandatory count...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
This study provides a new framework of analysis of the market and welfare effects of mandatory count...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...
Concerns over the total costs assessed to the beef industry from the implementation of mandatory cou...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Federal law requires most imports, including many food items, to bear labels informing the “ultimate...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
This study provides a new framework of analysis of the market and welfare effects of mandatory count...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
This study provides a new framework of analysis of the market and welfare effects of mandatory count...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...
Concerns over the total costs assessed to the beef industry from the implementation of mandatory cou...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Federal law requires most imports, including many food items, to bear labels informing the “ultimate...