Add to ORKG[eng]According to Sellars, our talk about meanings is essentially normative: meanings are roles confered on expressions by our linguistic rules. The opponents of this view argue that there is no kind of normativity affecting semantics. In this short paper I expose the sources of Sellars's normativism and I defend it against the objections of the anti-normativists
This article focuses on some issues in the contemporary debate about the normativity of meaning init...
According to a venerable tradition in philosophy and linguistics, expressions have meaning through b...
I defend the normativity of meaning against recent objections by arguing for a new interpretation of...
Meaning, according to a significant number of philosophers, is an intrinsically normative notion.1 F...
According to Paul Boghossian, the claim that the concept of linguistic meaning is normative has no p...
There has been much debate over whether to accept the claim that meaning is normative. One obstacle ...
According to Normativism, what an expression means has immediate implications for how a subject shou...
The question of whether meaning is inherently normative has become a central topic in philosophy and...
What is the normativity of (linguistic) meaning? What exactly does this thesis (that meaning is norm...
This paper presents a new argument to defend the normativity of meaning, specifically the thesis tha...
Kripke (1982: 37) famously contrasts norms with mere\ud dispositions: although the manifest disposit...
In his well-known essay on Wittgenstein, Saul Kripke maintains that dispositional analyses...
According to the normativists, dispositionalist theories of meaning fail because meaning is normativ...
Recent attempts to define and support realism in semantics seem to acknowledge, as the only defence ...
Many normative judgments play a practical role in our thought. This paper concerns how their practic...
This article focuses on some issues in the contemporary debate about the normativity of meaning init...
According to a venerable tradition in philosophy and linguistics, expressions have meaning through b...
I defend the normativity of meaning against recent objections by arguing for a new interpretation of...
Meaning, according to a significant number of philosophers, is an intrinsically normative notion.1 F...
According to Paul Boghossian, the claim that the concept of linguistic meaning is normative has no p...
There has been much debate over whether to accept the claim that meaning is normative. One obstacle ...
According to Normativism, what an expression means has immediate implications for how a subject shou...
The question of whether meaning is inherently normative has become a central topic in philosophy and...
What is the normativity of (linguistic) meaning? What exactly does this thesis (that meaning is norm...
This paper presents a new argument to defend the normativity of meaning, specifically the thesis tha...
Kripke (1982: 37) famously contrasts norms with mere\ud dispositions: although the manifest disposit...
In his well-known essay on Wittgenstein, Saul Kripke maintains that dispositional analyses...
According to the normativists, dispositionalist theories of meaning fail because meaning is normativ...
Recent attempts to define and support realism in semantics seem to acknowledge, as the only defence ...
Many normative judgments play a practical role in our thought. This paper concerns how their practic...
This article focuses on some issues in the contemporary debate about the normativity of meaning init...
According to a venerable tradition in philosophy and linguistics, expressions have meaning through b...
I defend the normativity of meaning against recent objections by arguing for a new interpretation of...