There has been much debate over whether to accept the claim that meaning is normative. One obstacle to making progress in that debate is that it is not always clear what the claim amounts to. In this paper, I try to resolve a dispute between those who advance the claim concerning how it should be understood. More specifically, I critically examine two competing conceptions of the normativity of meaning, rejecting one and defending the other. Though the paper aims to settle a dispute among proponents of the claim that meaning is normative, it should be of interest to those who challenge it. After all, before one takes aim, one’s target needs to be in clear view
Kripke (1982: 37) famously contrasts norms with mere\ud dispositions: although the manifest disposit...
According to a venerable tradition in philosophy and linguistics, expressions have meaning through b...
The aim is (i) to outline an account what it is to grasp the meaning of a predicative term, and (ii)...
Meaning, according to a significant number of philosophers, is an intrinsically normative notion.1 F...
What is the normativity of (linguistic) meaning? What exactly does this thesis (that meaning is norm...
According to Paul Boghossian, the claim that the concept of linguistic meaning is normative has no p...
According to Normativism, what an expression means has immediate implications for how a subject shou...
In his well-known essay on Wittgenstein, Saul Kripke maintains that dispositional analyses...
In this paper I propose an account of normativity of meaning that answers the skeptical challenge ag...
The question of whether meaning is inherently normative has become a central topic in philosophy and...
This paper presents a new argument to defend the normativity of meaning, specifically the thesis tha...
This article focuses on some issues in the contemporary debate about the normativity of meaning init...
I defend the normativity of meaning against recent objections by arguing for a new interpretation of...
Les mots peuvent être utilisés correctement ou non. Qu’un mot ait été utilisé correctement dépend de...
[eng]According to Sellars, our talk about meanings is essentially normative: meanings are ...
Kripke (1982: 37) famously contrasts norms with mere\ud dispositions: although the manifest disposit...
According to a venerable tradition in philosophy and linguistics, expressions have meaning through b...
The aim is (i) to outline an account what it is to grasp the meaning of a predicative term, and (ii)...
Meaning, according to a significant number of philosophers, is an intrinsically normative notion.1 F...
What is the normativity of (linguistic) meaning? What exactly does this thesis (that meaning is norm...
According to Paul Boghossian, the claim that the concept of linguistic meaning is normative has no p...
According to Normativism, what an expression means has immediate implications for how a subject shou...
In his well-known essay on Wittgenstein, Saul Kripke maintains that dispositional analyses...
In this paper I propose an account of normativity of meaning that answers the skeptical challenge ag...
The question of whether meaning is inherently normative has become a central topic in philosophy and...
This paper presents a new argument to defend the normativity of meaning, specifically the thesis tha...
This article focuses on some issues in the contemporary debate about the normativity of meaning init...
I defend the normativity of meaning against recent objections by arguing for a new interpretation of...
Les mots peuvent être utilisés correctement ou non. Qu’un mot ait été utilisé correctement dépend de...
[eng]According to Sellars, our talk about meanings is essentially normative: meanings are ...
Kripke (1982: 37) famously contrasts norms with mere\ud dispositions: although the manifest disposit...
According to a venerable tradition in philosophy and linguistics, expressions have meaning through b...
The aim is (i) to outline an account what it is to grasp the meaning of a predicative term, and (ii)...