G. E. Moore’s critical analysis of right action in utilitarian ethics and his consequentialist concept of right action is a starting point for a theory of moral/right action in ethics of social consequences. The terms right and wrong have different meanings in these theories. The author explores different aspects of right and wrong actions in ethics of social consequences and compares them with Moore’s ideas. He positively evaluates Moore’s contributions to the development his theory of moral/right action
My overall project is to clarify the distinctions among ethical theories. In doing this I am improvi...
Presented paper is going to introduce contemporary Slovak ethical theory, the ethics of social conse...
The paper argues that the moral philosophy of Thomas Hobbes is unified by a complex conception of re...
G. E. Moore’s critical analysis of right action in utilitarian ethics and his consequentialist conce...
One of the most fundamental questions about G. E. Moore's ethical\ud intuitionism relates to its sco...
In this paper I argue that the disagreement between modern moral philosophers and (some) virtue ethi...
This paper evaluates some arguments made against the conceptions of right action within virtue ethic...
A theory of virtue, according to one natural characterization, is fundamentally concerned with the d...
This chapter presents a new argument for thinking of traditional ethical theories as methods that ca...
The two objects of moral judgement are man and conduct. There are accordingly two kinds of moral ju...
the proclivity of many people to classify human acts as good or bad calls into mind the import of ET...
This paper sets out a novel challenge to consequentialism as a theory in normative ethics. The chall...
In his recent book The Dimensions of Consequentialism (2013), Martin Peterson defends, amongst other...
When Principia Ethica appeared, in 1903, it became something of a sacred text for the Cambridge-educ...
A perennial problem in moral philosophy concerns the formulation of an acceptable account of 'right ...
My overall project is to clarify the distinctions among ethical theories. In doing this I am improvi...
Presented paper is going to introduce contemporary Slovak ethical theory, the ethics of social conse...
The paper argues that the moral philosophy of Thomas Hobbes is unified by a complex conception of re...
G. E. Moore’s critical analysis of right action in utilitarian ethics and his consequentialist conce...
One of the most fundamental questions about G. E. Moore's ethical\ud intuitionism relates to its sco...
In this paper I argue that the disagreement between modern moral philosophers and (some) virtue ethi...
This paper evaluates some arguments made against the conceptions of right action within virtue ethic...
A theory of virtue, according to one natural characterization, is fundamentally concerned with the d...
This chapter presents a new argument for thinking of traditional ethical theories as methods that ca...
The two objects of moral judgement are man and conduct. There are accordingly two kinds of moral ju...
the proclivity of many people to classify human acts as good or bad calls into mind the import of ET...
This paper sets out a novel challenge to consequentialism as a theory in normative ethics. The chall...
In his recent book The Dimensions of Consequentialism (2013), Martin Peterson defends, amongst other...
When Principia Ethica appeared, in 1903, it became something of a sacred text for the Cambridge-educ...
A perennial problem in moral philosophy concerns the formulation of an acceptable account of 'right ...
My overall project is to clarify the distinctions among ethical theories. In doing this I am improvi...
Presented paper is going to introduce contemporary Slovak ethical theory, the ethics of social conse...
The paper argues that the moral philosophy of Thomas Hobbes is unified by a complex conception of re...