In an open letter published last year in the New York Times, 21 distinguished scientists (including three Nobel laureates) criticized Japan\u27s program of scientific research whaling, noting its poor design and unjustified reliance upon lethal sampling. In a recent Forum article in BioScience, Aron, Burke, and Freeman (2002) castigate the letter\u27s signers and accuse them of meddling in political issues without sufficient knowledge of the science involved in those issues
It is an honor to speak before you at this panel. The issue of whaling has been exte...
Japanese whaling practices have always sparked controversy among the international community. Japan\...
You published recently (Nature 374, 587; 1995) a report headed Error re-opens \u27scientific\u27 wh...
In “Scientists versus Whaling” (BioScience 52:1137–1140), Aron, Burke, and Freeman defend Japan's co...
Apparently alarmed that an advertisement in Nature referencing the study of Baker and Palumbi (Scien...
Eighteen years after initiating scientific whaling in Antarctic waters, Japan presented a new and mo...
In February 2011, in the midst of Japan\u27s widely-criticized research whale hunt, the Japanese Agr...
Normile reports on Japan\u27s expanded scientific whaling program and notes that Canada, the United...
SummaryThe fleet setting off last month for Japan's largest target for ‘scientific’ whaling, includi...
This case study focuses on the global strategies adopted by the Japanese whaling industry in the mid...
Whaling remains one of the most controversial and divisive aspects of the modern regulation of marin...
On 31 March 2014, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Japan’s whaling activities in ...
Morishita’s “multiple analysis”of the whaling issue [Morishita J. Multiple analysis of the whaling i...
Scientific whaling in the Southern Ocean has been a topical issue through scientific, political, ec...
Since the early 1980's an international debate has developed concerning the feasibility, necessity a...
It is an honor to speak before you at this panel. The issue of whaling has been exte...
Japanese whaling practices have always sparked controversy among the international community. Japan\...
You published recently (Nature 374, 587; 1995) a report headed Error re-opens \u27scientific\u27 wh...
In “Scientists versus Whaling” (BioScience 52:1137–1140), Aron, Burke, and Freeman defend Japan's co...
Apparently alarmed that an advertisement in Nature referencing the study of Baker and Palumbi (Scien...
Eighteen years after initiating scientific whaling in Antarctic waters, Japan presented a new and mo...
In February 2011, in the midst of Japan\u27s widely-criticized research whale hunt, the Japanese Agr...
Normile reports on Japan\u27s expanded scientific whaling program and notes that Canada, the United...
SummaryThe fleet setting off last month for Japan's largest target for ‘scientific’ whaling, includi...
This case study focuses on the global strategies adopted by the Japanese whaling industry in the mid...
Whaling remains one of the most controversial and divisive aspects of the modern regulation of marin...
On 31 March 2014, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Japan’s whaling activities in ...
Morishita’s “multiple analysis”of the whaling issue [Morishita J. Multiple analysis of the whaling i...
Scientific whaling in the Southern Ocean has been a topical issue through scientific, political, ec...
Since the early 1980's an international debate has developed concerning the feasibility, necessity a...
It is an honor to speak before you at this panel. The issue of whaling has been exte...
Japanese whaling practices have always sparked controversy among the international community. Japan\...
You published recently (Nature 374, 587; 1995) a report headed Error re-opens \u27scientific\u27 wh...