This paper advances a cognitive account of the rhetorical effectiveness of fallacious arguments and takes the example of source-related fallacies. Drawing on cognitive psychology and evolutionary linguistics, we claim that a fallacy enforces accessibility and epistemic cognitive constraints on argument processing targeted at preventing the addressee from spotting its fallaciousness, by managing to prevent or circumvent critical reactions. We address the evolutionary bases of biases and the way that these are exploited in fallacious argumentation
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
Claims of bias in other people are common, but when do we perceive bias in others? Some research h...
Outline listing argumentation and credibility appeals in persuasion. I. Cognitive Response Model, II...
This paper advances a cognitive account of the rhetorical effectiveness of fallacious arguments and ...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
Fallacies are a particular type of informal argument that are psychologically compelling and often u...
This paper focuses on the effects of motivational biases on the way people reason and debate in ever...
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignoranc...
A simple way to approach fallacies is to ask, Has reasoning-strategy X retarded or halted the growt...
The paper aims to investigate the mechanisms of incorrect and misleading reasoning with particular r...
This paper focuses on the effects of motivational biases on the way people reason and debate in ever...
This paper deals with the argumentative biases Conspiracy Theories (henceforth CTs) typically suffer...
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the effectiveness of the straw man fallacy, whi...
This paper offers a solution to the problem of understanding how a fallacious argument can be decept...
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
Claims of bias in other people are common, but when do we perceive bias in others? Some research h...
Outline listing argumentation and credibility appeals in persuasion. I. Cognitive Response Model, II...
This paper advances a cognitive account of the rhetorical effectiveness of fallacious arguments and ...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
Fallacies are a particular type of informal argument that are psychologically compelling and often u...
This paper focuses on the effects of motivational biases on the way people reason and debate in ever...
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignoranc...
A simple way to approach fallacies is to ask, Has reasoning-strategy X retarded or halted the growt...
The paper aims to investigate the mechanisms of incorrect and misleading reasoning with particular r...
This paper focuses on the effects of motivational biases on the way people reason and debate in ever...
This paper deals with the argumentative biases Conspiracy Theories (henceforth CTs) typically suffer...
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the effectiveness of the straw man fallacy, whi...
This paper offers a solution to the problem of understanding how a fallacious argument can be decept...
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
Claims of bias in other people are common, but when do we perceive bias in others? Some research h...
Outline listing argumentation and credibility appeals in persuasion. I. Cognitive Response Model, II...