Add to ORKGHow should we understand ‘the public’ in public dialogue given the dominant assumption within policy-making that the people brought together in these events must constitute a representative sample of the wider population? To improve the prospects for public dialogue and clarify what it can contribute to policy-making, this report explores ‘who or what is the public’ to make better sense of why and when public dialogue is carried out
Processes of participatory and deliberative democracy can be thought of as alternatives (or suppleme...
The “Open Air Laboratories” (OPAL) is a large, England-wide environmental public engagement (PE) pro...
Three models of expert-public interaction in science and technology communication are central: the d...
How should we understand ‘the public’ in public dialogue given the dominant assumption within policy...
In the UK public dialogue is championed in a number of policy areas as a new social space in which c...
This paper examines the way in which innovation in science policy in the UK over the last 25 years h...
The field of public participation in issues relating to science, technology and the environment is b...
While theoretical work and empirical research have examined science policyinforming “dialogue events...
Public dialogue can widen the knowledge base for decision making to make public policy and programme...
The focus of this paper is a distinction between the public-in-general and publics-in- particular. I...
A public dialogue is a qualitative research process during which public audiences interact with a va...
The discourse of public engagement with the sciences is based on the oft-cited premise that publics ...
Over the past 10 years, numerous public debates on new and emerging science and technologies have ta...
This review explores usage of the term public in debates about science and society. Since the 1980s,...
This article examines social science relevant to public engagements and identifies the challenges to...
Processes of participatory and deliberative democracy can be thought of as alternatives (or suppleme...
The “Open Air Laboratories” (OPAL) is a large, England-wide environmental public engagement (PE) pro...
Three models of expert-public interaction in science and technology communication are central: the d...
How should we understand ‘the public’ in public dialogue given the dominant assumption within policy...
In the UK public dialogue is championed in a number of policy areas as a new social space in which c...
This paper examines the way in which innovation in science policy in the UK over the last 25 years h...
The field of public participation in issues relating to science, technology and the environment is b...
While theoretical work and empirical research have examined science policyinforming “dialogue events...
Public dialogue can widen the knowledge base for decision making to make public policy and programme...
The focus of this paper is a distinction between the public-in-general and publics-in- particular. I...
A public dialogue is a qualitative research process during which public audiences interact with a va...
The discourse of public engagement with the sciences is based on the oft-cited premise that publics ...
Over the past 10 years, numerous public debates on new and emerging science and technologies have ta...
This review explores usage of the term public in debates about science and society. Since the 1980s,...
This article examines social science relevant to public engagements and identifies the challenges to...
Processes of participatory and deliberative democracy can be thought of as alternatives (or suppleme...
The “Open Air Laboratories” (OPAL) is a large, England-wide environmental public engagement (PE) pro...
Three models of expert-public interaction in science and technology communication are central: the d...