Add to ORKGWoodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuroanatomy has similarities with the structures in the human brain that support consciousness. (2) The complexity and flexibility of fish behaviour suggest that they are conscious. This commentary will argue that neither the neuroanatomical nor the behavioural argument can provide conclusive evidence for consciousness in fish. We should suspend judgement until we have discovered mathematical theories of consciousness that can reliably map between states of consciousness and states of the physical world
Contrary to Woodruff’s suggestion, investigations into possible reasoning capacities of cichlid figh...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff’s target article on teleost consciousness is a well-organized logical argument for consider...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Woodruff (2017) claims to have identified the neural correlates of phenomenal consciousness (“p-cons...
Ray-finned fish are often excluded from the group of non-human animals considered to have phenomenal...
We disagree with Woodruff that we have good neurobiological reasons to think fishes are sentient, be...
In my target article, I argued that the brains of ray-finned fishes of the teleost subclass (Actinop...
Woodruff (2017) has compiled a convincing array of data to support his contention that teleost fish ...
Woodruff’s case for fish sentience is intriguing. Though far from ready for final acceptance, it is ...
Questions about fish consciousness and cognition are receiving increasing attention. In this paper, ...
From the perspective of a comparative neuroanatomist studying the avian pallium, Woodruff’s (2017) c...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff’s target article provides a detailed review of comparative studies on brain and behavior in...
Contrary to Woodruff’s suggestion, investigations into possible reasoning capacities of cichlid figh...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff’s target article on teleost consciousness is a well-organized logical argument for consider...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Woodruff (2017) claims to have identified the neural correlates of phenomenal consciousness (“p-cons...
Ray-finned fish are often excluded from the group of non-human animals considered to have phenomenal...
We disagree with Woodruff that we have good neurobiological reasons to think fishes are sentient, be...
In my target article, I argued that the brains of ray-finned fishes of the teleost subclass (Actinop...
Woodruff (2017) has compiled a convincing array of data to support his contention that teleost fish ...
Woodruff’s case for fish sentience is intriguing. Though far from ready for final acceptance, it is ...
Questions about fish consciousness and cognition are receiving increasing attention. In this paper, ...
From the perspective of a comparative neuroanatomist studying the avian pallium, Woodruff’s (2017) c...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff’s target article provides a detailed review of comparative studies on brain and behavior in...
Contrary to Woodruff’s suggestion, investigations into possible reasoning capacities of cichlid figh...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff’s target article on teleost consciousness is a well-organized logical argument for consider...