Figure S10. Subfigures zooming of Additional file 3: Figure S2 to compare precision and recall statistics between ADseq and AD. Upper graphs: zoom of results with 50% of reads. Lower graphs: results with all reads. (PDF 136 kb
Table S1. Summary of genome assemblies and sequencing data information. 16 on the 18 Anopheles speci...
Table S2. Assembly statistics on the 18 Anopheles genomes. Statistics before before processing are d...
Figure S1. A phylogenetic tree and types of rearrangements determined by the MGR program. A) Reconst...
Figure S9. Subfigures zooming of Additional file 9: Figure S8 to compare precision and recall stati...
Figure S8. Precision and recall statistics for scaffolding adjacencies on three artificially fragmen...
Figure S12. Similar to Additional file 12: Figure S11 with all reads included. (PDF 20 kb
Figure S15. Similar to Additional file 14: Figure S13 with RAW gene trees instead of ProfileNJ gene...
Figure S11. Venn diagrams showing adjacencies shared by the three scaffolding methods ADseq, AD and ...
Figure S14. Similar to Additional file 14: Figure S13 with WG species tree phylogeny. (PDF 56 kb
Figure S2. The pipeline is split into two parts: The first part (Blue one) processes genome content ...
Figure S1. Extant and ancestral genome gene content (left) and ancestral gene degree (right). Left: ...
Figure S5. Distributions of scaffolding adjacencies scores computed by BESST for scaffolding adjacen...
Table S3. Assembly statistics at various stages of the gene annotation step of validation protocol o...
Figure S3. Distribution of gene families number (red bars) and number of genes (blue bars) per famil...
Figure S4. Pipeline to improve gene trees inference from homologous gene family. CDS sequences of ge...
Table S1. Summary of genome assemblies and sequencing data information. 16 on the 18 Anopheles speci...
Table S2. Assembly statistics on the 18 Anopheles genomes. Statistics before before processing are d...
Figure S1. A phylogenetic tree and types of rearrangements determined by the MGR program. A) Reconst...
Figure S9. Subfigures zooming of Additional file 9: Figure S8 to compare precision and recall stati...
Figure S8. Precision and recall statistics for scaffolding adjacencies on three artificially fragmen...
Figure S12. Similar to Additional file 12: Figure S11 with all reads included. (PDF 20 kb
Figure S15. Similar to Additional file 14: Figure S13 with RAW gene trees instead of ProfileNJ gene...
Figure S11. Venn diagrams showing adjacencies shared by the three scaffolding methods ADseq, AD and ...
Figure S14. Similar to Additional file 14: Figure S13 with WG species tree phylogeny. (PDF 56 kb
Figure S2. The pipeline is split into two parts: The first part (Blue one) processes genome content ...
Figure S1. Extant and ancestral genome gene content (left) and ancestral gene degree (right). Left: ...
Figure S5. Distributions of scaffolding adjacencies scores computed by BESST for scaffolding adjacen...
Table S3. Assembly statistics at various stages of the gene annotation step of validation protocol o...
Figure S3. Distribution of gene families number (red bars) and number of genes (blue bars) per famil...
Figure S4. Pipeline to improve gene trees inference from homologous gene family. CDS sequences of ge...
Table S1. Summary of genome assemblies and sequencing data information. 16 on the 18 Anopheles speci...
Table S2. Assembly statistics on the 18 Anopheles genomes. Statistics before before processing are d...
Figure S1. A phylogenetic tree and types of rearrangements determined by the MGR program. A) Reconst...