We study a legislative assembly that chooses its agenda protocol endogenously. We generalize McKelvey and Riezman’s (1992) seminal theory on seniority in legislatures, by allowing for a large class of ordinal agenda rules that assign different recognition probability to each legislator. We consider two stages — the selection of agenda rules, and the decision making that transpires under them. We predict that the agenda rules chosen in equilibrium preserve seniority distinctions, disproportionately favor more senior legislators, and generate an incumbency advantage to all legislators.Governmen
What is the value of committee service to an individual legislator? Self-selection and party control...
We present a model of (re)elections in which an incumbency advantage arises because the incumbent ca...
This paper proposes an argument that explains incumbency advantage without recurring to the collecti...
We construct a stochastic game model of a legislature with an endogenously determined seniority syst...
In this article, we elaborate on a strategic view of institutional features. Our focus is on seniori...
We compare two different seniority systems in a legislature whose sole task is to decide on distribu...
This paper uses experiments to explore electoral accountability in a legislative system that favors ...
The rise of the power of the Tea Party in the House of Representatives has raised numerous questions...
In this paper we argue that institutional changes to the seniority system have electoral consequence...
This paper addresses the impact information has on electoral accountability in a legislative system ...
This paper proposes an argument that explains incumbency advantage without recurring to the collecti...
This paper estimates the effects of initial committee seniority on the career outcomes of Democratic...
This paper addresses the interaction of voter information and seniority on electoral accountability....
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
Field of study: Political science.Dr. Peverill Squire, Dissertation Supervisor.Includes vita."Decemb...
What is the value of committee service to an individual legislator? Self-selection and party control...
We present a model of (re)elections in which an incumbency advantage arises because the incumbent ca...
This paper proposes an argument that explains incumbency advantage without recurring to the collecti...
We construct a stochastic game model of a legislature with an endogenously determined seniority syst...
In this article, we elaborate on a strategic view of institutional features. Our focus is on seniori...
We compare two different seniority systems in a legislature whose sole task is to decide on distribu...
This paper uses experiments to explore electoral accountability in a legislative system that favors ...
The rise of the power of the Tea Party in the House of Representatives has raised numerous questions...
In this paper we argue that institutional changes to the seniority system have electoral consequence...
This paper addresses the impact information has on electoral accountability in a legislative system ...
This paper proposes an argument that explains incumbency advantage without recurring to the collecti...
This paper estimates the effects of initial committee seniority on the career outcomes of Democratic...
This paper addresses the interaction of voter information and seniority on electoral accountability....
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
Field of study: Political science.Dr. Peverill Squire, Dissertation Supervisor.Includes vita."Decemb...
What is the value of committee service to an individual legislator? Self-selection and party control...
We present a model of (re)elections in which an incumbency advantage arises because the incumbent ca...
This paper proposes an argument that explains incumbency advantage without recurring to the collecti...