The encoding standards that the community of digital humanities (DH) has established for digital scholarly editions imply a series of consequences concerning both the philological model and the scientific community, favoring editions based on single witnesses (or on multiple witnesses treated as a chain of single witnesses) and creating a dangerous “digital divide.” Texts with complex transmissions and editions with sophisticated requirements need systems and tools fitter than XML-TEI (see http://www.tei-c.org/P5). This paper looks at new proposals via the case of Corpus Rhythmorum Musicum
Since the earliest days of hypertext, textual scholars have produced, discussed and theorised upon c...
This paper describes the limitations of critical editions of music in book format, and presents an a...
International audienceQuesta relazione propone un nuovo corso online destinato all’insegnamento e al...
The encoding standards that the community of digital humanities (DH) has established for digital sc...
Recent proposals for creating digital scholarly editions (DSEs) through the crowdsourcing of transcr...
In the past few decades the number of TEI-encoded scholarly digital editions (SDEs) has risen signif...
Both traditional and digital editing essentially consist of the inputting of text. When the source i...
We propose to develop / expand the concept of “digital edition of a text”. The specific value of a d...
Abstract Electronic text encoding lays the groundwork for a new way of scholarly editing. Text enco...
Es descriuen les característiques principals de l'estàndard TEI (Text Encoding Initiative), un llen...
In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which p...
Paper delivered during the Humanities Postgraduates Conference, held at De Montfort University the 3...
A common trope in discussions of scholarly editions in digital form is to praise, on the one hand, t...
This volume presents the state of the art in digital scholarly editing. Drawing together the work of...
Scholarly editing and textual digitisation are typically seen as two distinct, though related, fiel...
Since the earliest days of hypertext, textual scholars have produced, discussed and theorised upon c...
This paper describes the limitations of critical editions of music in book format, and presents an a...
International audienceQuesta relazione propone un nuovo corso online destinato all’insegnamento e al...
The encoding standards that the community of digital humanities (DH) has established for digital sc...
Recent proposals for creating digital scholarly editions (DSEs) through the crowdsourcing of transcr...
In the past few decades the number of TEI-encoded scholarly digital editions (SDEs) has risen signif...
Both traditional and digital editing essentially consist of the inputting of text. When the source i...
We propose to develop / expand the concept of “digital edition of a text”. The specific value of a d...
Abstract Electronic text encoding lays the groundwork for a new way of scholarly editing. Text enco...
Es descriuen les característiques principals de l'estàndard TEI (Text Encoding Initiative), un llen...
In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which p...
Paper delivered during the Humanities Postgraduates Conference, held at De Montfort University the 3...
A common trope in discussions of scholarly editions in digital form is to praise, on the one hand, t...
This volume presents the state of the art in digital scholarly editing. Drawing together the work of...
Scholarly editing and textual digitisation are typically seen as two distinct, though related, fiel...
Since the earliest days of hypertext, textual scholars have produced, discussed and theorised upon c...
This paper describes the limitations of critical editions of music in book format, and presents an a...
International audienceQuesta relazione propone un nuovo corso online destinato all’insegnamento e al...