<p>In (A), we plot the expected contribution as a function of the scaled selection coefficient. We measure genetic variance in units of <b>v</b><sub><b>S</b></sub>—the expected contribution at sites under strong selection. In (B), we show the proportion of additive genetic variance that arises from sites with minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than the value on the <i>x</i>-axis, for different selection coefficients.</p
<p>Significance of <i>F</i> values is marked as *** <i>P</i> < 0.001; ** <i>P</i> < 0.01.</p><p>The ...
<p>The value of the dominance coefficient was held constant at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 or 1 in all locati...
Unconditionally deleterious mutations could be an important source of variation in quantitative trai...
<p>Our approximations for sites under strong selection (Eqs <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/arti...
<p>(A) The cumulative variance arising from sites with contributions above a threshold as a function...
The relative proportion of additive and non-additive variation for complex traits is important in ev...
Proportion of additive genetic variance, explained by 1 Mb windows of adjacent SNPs, for the polled ...
<p>Under additive (<b>a</b>), dominant (<b>b</b>), or additive by additive (<b>c, d</b>) models, the...
<p>For <i>(a)</i> Genetic variance and <i>(b)</i> Additive variance as a proportion of genetic varia...
<p>The traits analyzed are first-visit SBP and DBP respectively for genotyped and imputed SNPs. The ...
The Fisher?s infinitesimal model is traditionally used in quantitative genetics and genomic selectio...
The aim of this work was to investigate the short-term behavior of the genetic variability of quanti...
The role of adaptation in biological invasions will depend on the availability of genetic variation ...
<p>Most synonymous mutations (<i>left panel</i>) have very low selection coefficients. For non-synon...
<p>(<b>A</b>) A SNP's effect on the trait is correlated with its effect on fitness (τ = 0.5). Note t...
<p>Significance of <i>F</i> values is marked as *** <i>P</i> < 0.001; ** <i>P</i> < 0.01.</p><p>The ...
<p>The value of the dominance coefficient was held constant at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 or 1 in all locati...
Unconditionally deleterious mutations could be an important source of variation in quantitative trai...
<p>Our approximations for sites under strong selection (Eqs <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/arti...
<p>(A) The cumulative variance arising from sites with contributions above a threshold as a function...
The relative proportion of additive and non-additive variation for complex traits is important in ev...
Proportion of additive genetic variance, explained by 1 Mb windows of adjacent SNPs, for the polled ...
<p>Under additive (<b>a</b>), dominant (<b>b</b>), or additive by additive (<b>c, d</b>) models, the...
<p>For <i>(a)</i> Genetic variance and <i>(b)</i> Additive variance as a proportion of genetic varia...
<p>The traits analyzed are first-visit SBP and DBP respectively for genotyped and imputed SNPs. The ...
The Fisher?s infinitesimal model is traditionally used in quantitative genetics and genomic selectio...
The aim of this work was to investigate the short-term behavior of the genetic variability of quanti...
The role of adaptation in biological invasions will depend on the availability of genetic variation ...
<p>Most synonymous mutations (<i>left panel</i>) have very low selection coefficients. For non-synon...
<p>(<b>A</b>) A SNP's effect on the trait is correlated with its effect on fitness (τ = 0.5). Note t...
<p>Significance of <i>F</i> values is marked as *** <i>P</i> < 0.001; ** <i>P</i> < 0.01.</p><p>The ...
<p>The value of the dominance coefficient was held constant at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 or 1 in all locati...
Unconditionally deleterious mutations could be an important source of variation in quantitative trai...