The notion of more truth, or of more truth and less falsehood, is central to epistemology. Yet, I argue, we have no idea what this consists in, as the most natural or obvious thing to say—that more truth is a matter of a greater number of truths, and less falsehood is a matter of a lesser number of falsehoods—is ultimately implausible. The issue is important not merely because the notion of more truth and less falsehood is central to epistemology, but because an implicit, false picture of what this consists in underpins and gives shape to much contemporary epistemology
Because idealizations frequently advance scientific understanding, many claim that falsehoods play a...
Confronting the Liar Paradox is commonly viewed as a prerequisite for developing a theory of truth. ...
There is a widespread view according to which the denial that the conditions of knowledge are truth-...
The notion of more truth, or of more truth and less falsehood, is central to epistemology. Yet, I ar...
My dissertation explores the following questions at the intersection of epistemology and value theor...
We are naturally inclined to judge that it is better to know that p than to merely truly believe tha...
The value problem in epistemology is to explain why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief...
Why is knowledge better than mere true belief ? To make progress in answering that question, we need...
To say that evidence is normative is to say that what evidence one possesses, and how this evidence ...
A popular account of epistemic justification holds that justification, in essence, aims at truth. An...
In this article I argue that the value of epistemic justification cannot be adequately explained as ...
A vexing problem in contemporary epistemology – one with origins in Plato’s Meno – concerns the valu...
Why are the conditions for propositional knowledge so difficult to discover or devise in this post-G...
Several argue that truth cannot be science’s sole epistemic goal, for it would fail to do ...
Any theory of epistemic justification must address the question of what its aim is and why we value ...
Because idealizations frequently advance scientific understanding, many claim that falsehoods play a...
Confronting the Liar Paradox is commonly viewed as a prerequisite for developing a theory of truth. ...
There is a widespread view according to which the denial that the conditions of knowledge are truth-...
The notion of more truth, or of more truth and less falsehood, is central to epistemology. Yet, I ar...
My dissertation explores the following questions at the intersection of epistemology and value theor...
We are naturally inclined to judge that it is better to know that p than to merely truly believe tha...
The value problem in epistemology is to explain why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief...
Why is knowledge better than mere true belief ? To make progress in answering that question, we need...
To say that evidence is normative is to say that what evidence one possesses, and how this evidence ...
A popular account of epistemic justification holds that justification, in essence, aims at truth. An...
In this article I argue that the value of epistemic justification cannot be adequately explained as ...
A vexing problem in contemporary epistemology – one with origins in Plato’s Meno – concerns the valu...
Why are the conditions for propositional knowledge so difficult to discover or devise in this post-G...
Several argue that truth cannot be science’s sole epistemic goal, for it would fail to do ...
Any theory of epistemic justification must address the question of what its aim is and why we value ...
Because idealizations frequently advance scientific understanding, many claim that falsehoods play a...
Confronting the Liar Paradox is commonly viewed as a prerequisite for developing a theory of truth. ...
There is a widespread view according to which the denial that the conditions of knowledge are truth-...