yesWe thank Professors Evans and Wilkins for their interest in our systematic review.(1) We have reached the same conclusion as previous systematic reviews published in 2008(2) and 2014(3) and a review prepared for the New Zealand Ministry for Health in 2009.(4) Even the ‘alternative systematic review’ prepared by Professors Evans and Allen about which we have significant misgivings concludes that ‘larger and rigorous randomised controlled trials of interventions for visual stress are required’.(5)A response to Professors Evans and Wilkins regarding the systematic review: Griffiths PG, Taylor RH, Henderson LM and Barrett BT (2016) The effect of coloured overlays and lenses on reading: a systematic review of the literature. Ophthal...
Dear Sir, I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews ...
Abstract: In their letter to the Editor in this issue, Kolstoe and Carpenter challenge a core aspect...
Book review: systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. Second edition: from expert to n...
yesWe read with interest the review written by Evans and Allen, and published in the Journal of Opto...
Reply to the letter to the Editor \u201cComplete transparency of a systematic review for readers\u20...
yesWe thank Professors Evans and Allen for their interest in our article.1 2 The charity websites...
This letter is a response to a guide to performing systematic reviews which points out several signi...
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Letter to the Editor by Dana J. Lawrence. In his let...
Comment on Parker RMN, Boulos L, Visintini S, Ritchie K, Hayden J. Environmental scan and evaluation...
We apologise for not having noticed earlier Adrion and colleagues’ comments on our study comparing t...
We appreciate the interest in our work. To date, we have received correspondence from the chiropract...
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the REBALANCE team for commenting on the REBALANCE ...
As a research group with no commercial interest in any macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measur...
de Vries et al. (2016) argue that discussion of the 5-HTTLPR-stress gene-environment interaction (G ...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Goldstein et al.’s (2017) attempted ...
Dear Sir, I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews ...
Abstract: In their letter to the Editor in this issue, Kolstoe and Carpenter challenge a core aspect...
Book review: systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. Second edition: from expert to n...
yesWe read with interest the review written by Evans and Allen, and published in the Journal of Opto...
Reply to the letter to the Editor \u201cComplete transparency of a systematic review for readers\u20...
yesWe thank Professors Evans and Allen for their interest in our article.1 2 The charity websites...
This letter is a response to a guide to performing systematic reviews which points out several signi...
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Letter to the Editor by Dana J. Lawrence. In his let...
Comment on Parker RMN, Boulos L, Visintini S, Ritchie K, Hayden J. Environmental scan and evaluation...
We apologise for not having noticed earlier Adrion and colleagues’ comments on our study comparing t...
We appreciate the interest in our work. To date, we have received correspondence from the chiropract...
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the REBALANCE team for commenting on the REBALANCE ...
As a research group with no commercial interest in any macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measur...
de Vries et al. (2016) argue that discussion of the 5-HTTLPR-stress gene-environment interaction (G ...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Goldstein et al.’s (2017) attempted ...
Dear Sir, I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews ...
Abstract: In their letter to the Editor in this issue, Kolstoe and Carpenter challenge a core aspect...
Book review: systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. Second edition: from expert to n...