This letter is a response to a guide to performing systematic reviews which points out several significant problems with the advice given and calls for retraction or extensive revision of that article
Our previous work identified that nine leading guidance documents for seven different types of syste...
Abstract A study conducted by Lai and colleagues, published this week in BMC Medicine,...
Introduction Professor Archibald Cochrane, after whom the Cochrane Collaboration is named, was influ...
yesWe thank Professors Evans and Wilkins for their interest in our systematic review.(1) We have r...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
Reply to the letter to the Editor “Complete transparency of a systematic review for readers”. Fi...
Comment on Parker RMN, Boulos L, Visintini S, Ritchie K, Hayden J. Environmental scan and evaluation...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Goldstein et al.’s (2017) attempted ...
Synthesizing research evidence using systematic and rigorous methods has become a key feature of evi...
A high quality systematic review search has three core attributes; it is systematic, comprehensive, ...
BACKGROUND: The systematic review is a scientific method for identifying and presenting early resear...
Systematic review and meta-analysis are a gift to the modern researcher, delivering a crystallised u...
BACKGROUND: Systematic literature searching is recognised as a critical component of the systematic ...
Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleBackground Systematic reviews ...
BACKGROUND: The systematic review is a scientific method for identifying and presenting early resear...
Our previous work identified that nine leading guidance documents for seven different types of syste...
Abstract A study conducted by Lai and colleagues, published this week in BMC Medicine,...
Introduction Professor Archibald Cochrane, after whom the Cochrane Collaboration is named, was influ...
yesWe thank Professors Evans and Wilkins for their interest in our systematic review.(1) We have r...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
Reply to the letter to the Editor “Complete transparency of a systematic review for readers”. Fi...
Comment on Parker RMN, Boulos L, Visintini S, Ritchie K, Hayden J. Environmental scan and evaluation...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Goldstein et al.’s (2017) attempted ...
Synthesizing research evidence using systematic and rigorous methods has become a key feature of evi...
A high quality systematic review search has three core attributes; it is systematic, comprehensive, ...
BACKGROUND: The systematic review is a scientific method for identifying and presenting early resear...
Systematic review and meta-analysis are a gift to the modern researcher, delivering a crystallised u...
BACKGROUND: Systematic literature searching is recognised as a critical component of the systematic ...
Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleBackground Systematic reviews ...
BACKGROUND: The systematic review is a scientific method for identifying and presenting early resear...
Our previous work identified that nine leading guidance documents for seven different types of syste...
Abstract A study conducted by Lai and colleagues, published this week in BMC Medicine,...
Introduction Professor Archibald Cochrane, after whom the Cochrane Collaboration is named, was influ...
DOI
Add to ORKG