Add to ORKGThe authors respond to a wide range of objections defending our argument that some forms of behaviour modification utilising advances in the cognitive sciences are desirable and need not necessarily undermine autonomy or freedom
I would like to thank the five commentators in this symposium (Jennifer Cyr, Gary Goertz, Alan M. Ja...
The commentators on our target article have raised some excellent points relative to our article, an...
The target article on robust modeling (Lee et al. in review) generated a lot of commentary. In this ...
The authors respond to a wide range of objections defending our argument that some forms of behaviou...
The invited commentaries to Hobbis and Sutton (this issue) show that we achieved our aim of stimulat...
We are grateful for the two stimulating and thought provoking commentaries by Lamberton (2020) and M...
A unique advantage of Psychological Inquiry’s format is that it encourages a free exchange of ideas ...
The commentaries on my target article tend to be either supportive and expansive or corrective. I re...
Let me express my deep thanks to the contributors for taking the time to read my book, Mind in Life,...
I wish to thank all commentators for their stimulating contributions. The first thing to note in res...
The commentaries on my target article tend to be either supportive and expansive or corrective. I re...
I thank the commentators for their reviews; they helped to strengthen the paper and raised important...
critical analysis of arguments for role of cognitive science, experimental analysis of behavior, lit...
In this essay, I respond to the critical remarks of Louise Barrett, Amanda Corris and Anthony Chemer...
This article is a response to six critics of my article, “Scientific Understanding and the Control o...
I would like to thank the five commentators in this symposium (Jennifer Cyr, Gary Goertz, Alan M. Ja...
The commentators on our target article have raised some excellent points relative to our article, an...
The target article on robust modeling (Lee et al. in review) generated a lot of commentary. In this ...
The authors respond to a wide range of objections defending our argument that some forms of behaviou...
The invited commentaries to Hobbis and Sutton (this issue) show that we achieved our aim of stimulat...
We are grateful for the two stimulating and thought provoking commentaries by Lamberton (2020) and M...
A unique advantage of Psychological Inquiry’s format is that it encourages a free exchange of ideas ...
The commentaries on my target article tend to be either supportive and expansive or corrective. I re...
Let me express my deep thanks to the contributors for taking the time to read my book, Mind in Life,...
I wish to thank all commentators for their stimulating contributions. The first thing to note in res...
The commentaries on my target article tend to be either supportive and expansive or corrective. I re...
I thank the commentators for their reviews; they helped to strengthen the paper and raised important...
critical analysis of arguments for role of cognitive science, experimental analysis of behavior, lit...
In this essay, I respond to the critical remarks of Louise Barrett, Amanda Corris and Anthony Chemer...
This article is a response to six critics of my article, “Scientific Understanding and the Control o...
I would like to thank the five commentators in this symposium (Jennifer Cyr, Gary Goertz, Alan M. Ja...
The commentators on our target article have raised some excellent points relative to our article, an...
The target article on robust modeling (Lee et al. in review) generated a lot of commentary. In this ...