Universities are funded by public means to a large extend. It’s reasonable to expect that society benefits from the results. For scientific research this means that it should at least have a potential societal impact. Universities and individual investigators must explicitly consider the societal relevance of their research activities. And also report on it explicitly. Core questions are: ‘Do we do the right things?’ and ‘Do we do them right?’ This implies that next to indicators of scientific quality, attention should be given to indicators of societal relevance. This dual aim is placed in the context of current evaluation practices of academical research. A proposal for 12 indicators of societal relevance is formulated, focussing on both ...
Science policymakers and funding agencies are increasingly interested in the societal impact of rese...
In the knowledge economy the evaluation of research institutions is an important element, in particu...
Societal impact has not often been systematically included in research evaluation procedures. Where ...
Universities are, to a large extent, publicly funded. It is reasonable to expect that society should...
Scientific research is performed to elucidate how the world around us is functioning. One dimension ...
At the same time as the productivity of academics have become more formalized and institutionalized ...
The discussion on the 'societal impact of university research' has emerged within the recent decade ...
The last decade has seen the evaluation of health research pay more and more attention to societal u...
Evaluation of the societal relevance of academic research is developing rapidly. This guide presents...
Since the 1990s, the scope of research evaluations becomes broader as the societal products (outputs...
An introduction to: Evaluating Research in Context A method for comprehensive assessment (2nd editio...
The chapter introduces the reader to the notion of the broader societal impacts of research, and to ...
Worldwide, most scientific research is conducted in higher education institutions. Funding for scien...
Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we eval...
It is expected that science should make significant impact for society. However, nowadays the scienc...
Science policymakers and funding agencies are increasingly interested in the societal impact of rese...
In the knowledge economy the evaluation of research institutions is an important element, in particu...
Societal impact has not often been systematically included in research evaluation procedures. Where ...
Universities are, to a large extent, publicly funded. It is reasonable to expect that society should...
Scientific research is performed to elucidate how the world around us is functioning. One dimension ...
At the same time as the productivity of academics have become more formalized and institutionalized ...
The discussion on the 'societal impact of university research' has emerged within the recent decade ...
The last decade has seen the evaluation of health research pay more and more attention to societal u...
Evaluation of the societal relevance of academic research is developing rapidly. This guide presents...
Since the 1990s, the scope of research evaluations becomes broader as the societal products (outputs...
An introduction to: Evaluating Research in Context A method for comprehensive assessment (2nd editio...
The chapter introduces the reader to the notion of the broader societal impacts of research, and to ...
Worldwide, most scientific research is conducted in higher education institutions. Funding for scien...
Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we eval...
It is expected that science should make significant impact for society. However, nowadays the scienc...
Science policymakers and funding agencies are increasingly interested in the societal impact of rese...
In the knowledge economy the evaluation of research institutions is an important element, in particu...
Societal impact has not often been systematically included in research evaluation procedures. Where ...