Add to ORKGEach State Party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC) that knows or suspects it has areas under its jurisdiction or control that contain anti-personnel (AP) mines has a clear deadline to locate and destroy those mines. According to Article 5(1), upon becoming party to the APMBC, a State must complete clearance within ten years, unless the deadline is pushed back in an agreement from the other States Parties at an annual meeting or five-yearly review conference
This article explores areas of liability in mine action operations. It defines the concept of residu...
Armed non-state actors are currently involved as fighting parties in conflicts all over the world; h...
Antipersonnel (A/P) land mines are devastating weapons not only during, but also after, warfare or a...
The Convention\u27s parties, with the support of a wide range of organisations, have made great prog...
In June 2014, State Parties to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC) met in Maputo, Mozambi...
Under Article 5 of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfe...
Key Findings: In 2019, a global total of more than 131 square kilometers was cleared of anti-perso...
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines was very specific in saying that there were to be no exc...
Seventy-third session First Committee Agenda item 101 (m) General and complete disarmament: implemen...
This article addresses the mine-action challenges Thailand faces in maintaining compliance with the ...
With clearance deadlines for States Parties to the Ottawa Convention approaching or having passed, a...
Just over 20 years ago, states and civil society came together to put an end to the harm inflicted b...
As the 10-year deadline for fulfilling Article 5 of the Ottawa Convention is rapidly approaching for...
States affected by landmines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) are faced with a number of difficul...
The U.S. government has been a pioneer and dedicated supporter of humanitarian mine action since the...
This article explores areas of liability in mine action operations. It defines the concept of residu...
Armed non-state actors are currently involved as fighting parties in conflicts all over the world; h...
Antipersonnel (A/P) land mines are devastating weapons not only during, but also after, warfare or a...
The Convention\u27s parties, with the support of a wide range of organisations, have made great prog...
In June 2014, State Parties to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC) met in Maputo, Mozambi...
Under Article 5 of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfe...
Key Findings: In 2019, a global total of more than 131 square kilometers was cleared of anti-perso...
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines was very specific in saying that there were to be no exc...
Seventy-third session First Committee Agenda item 101 (m) General and complete disarmament: implemen...
This article addresses the mine-action challenges Thailand faces in maintaining compliance with the ...
With clearance deadlines for States Parties to the Ottawa Convention approaching or having passed, a...
Just over 20 years ago, states and civil society came together to put an end to the harm inflicted b...
As the 10-year deadline for fulfilling Article 5 of the Ottawa Convention is rapidly approaching for...
States affected by landmines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) are faced with a number of difficul...
The U.S. government has been a pioneer and dedicated supporter of humanitarian mine action since the...
This article explores areas of liability in mine action operations. It defines the concept of residu...
Armed non-state actors are currently involved as fighting parties in conflicts all over the world; h...
Antipersonnel (A/P) land mines are devastating weapons not only during, but also after, warfare or a...