Add to ORKGWith clearance deadlines for States Parties to the Ottawa Convention approaching or having passed, and available humanitarian aid being spread among an exploding number of worthy activities, should mine-action programs be held to the stringent letter of the Convention? The author posits that, with a simple solution, States Parties can fulfill the spirit of the agreement while eliminating costly, time-consuming and inefficient clearance obligations
With the impending 2009 Ottawa Convention deadline quickly approaching, it has become clear that Moz...
Mine action is changing. This is not 1997 and what the international community has learned in the pa...
Seventy-third session First Committee Agenda item 101 (m) General and complete disarmament: implemen...
Under Article 5 of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfe...
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines was very specific in saying that there were to be no exc...
States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions have refined the victim-assistance concepts fo...
As the 10-year deadline for fulfilling Article 5 of the Ottawa Convention is rapidly approaching for...
I was dismayed to read Dennis Barlow’s editorial “Amending the Ottawa Convention: A Way Forward,” in...
Each State Party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC) that knows or suspects it has are...
Seldom has a name caused such polarity among like-minded people, in this case those concerned with m...
Just over 20 years ago, states and civil society came together to put an end to the harm inflicted b...
Cost-effectiveness in the traditional sense of the word has many aspects and can be displayed in man...
The Ottawa Convention was signed by 122 countries in Ottawa in December 1997. In September of the fo...
The paper is divided into two parts; the first part provides an explanation and the second adds to p...
More than a decade has passed since the monumental Ottawa Mine Ban Convention was opened for signatu...
With the impending 2009 Ottawa Convention deadline quickly approaching, it has become clear that Moz...
Mine action is changing. This is not 1997 and what the international community has learned in the pa...
Seventy-third session First Committee Agenda item 101 (m) General and complete disarmament: implemen...
Under Article 5 of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfe...
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines was very specific in saying that there were to be no exc...
States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions have refined the victim-assistance concepts fo...
As the 10-year deadline for fulfilling Article 5 of the Ottawa Convention is rapidly approaching for...
I was dismayed to read Dennis Barlow’s editorial “Amending the Ottawa Convention: A Way Forward,” in...
Each State Party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC) that knows or suspects it has are...
Seldom has a name caused such polarity among like-minded people, in this case those concerned with m...
Just over 20 years ago, states and civil society came together to put an end to the harm inflicted b...
Cost-effectiveness in the traditional sense of the word has many aspects and can be displayed in man...
The Ottawa Convention was signed by 122 countries in Ottawa in December 1997. In September of the fo...
The paper is divided into two parts; the first part provides an explanation and the second adds to p...
More than a decade has passed since the monumental Ottawa Mine Ban Convention was opened for signatu...
With the impending 2009 Ottawa Convention deadline quickly approaching, it has become clear that Moz...
Mine action is changing. This is not 1997 and what the international community has learned in the pa...
Seventy-third session First Committee Agenda item 101 (m) General and complete disarmament: implemen...