<p>Note: The FN-weighted WM network for each participant was constructed under the threshold T = 3. The comparisons of nodal efficiency were performed between groups for each brain region. <i>p</i><0.05 (uncorrected) was considered significant.</p
<p>The regional correlation strength of the nodes were redistributed and higher in healthy control c...
<p>Panels plot group-wise graph-theoretic metrics averaged over all connection densities considered....
<p>The node size indicates the number of topological properties with significant group differences. ...
<p>The node sizes indicate the significance of between-group differences in the regional efficiency....
<p>The FN-weighted network of each subject was constructed with different thresholds (T = 1,2,3,4,5)...
<p>The hub regions were identified if E<sub>nodal</sub>(i) was at least one SD greater than the mean...
<p>Note: The WM network with different connectivity metrics (FN-weighted, FA-weighted and binary net...
<p>Connections of cortical structural network for strategic/executive control with other networks me...
Brain regions with significant differences in local efficiency between the CCH and control groups (c...
<p>The “hubs” were redistributed and the nodes that were 1 SD over the mean regional efficiency tend...
<p>The node size indicates the number of basic properties with significant group differences. The no...
<p>Note: A corrected threshold of <i>P</i><0.05 corrected by FDR was taken as meaning that there was...
<p>Brain Regions with Significant Correlations between Node Global Efficiency and Scores from Remote...
<p>Shown are the nodes of the networks, defined in terms of regional connectivity strength (A) and r...
<p>The lower panel shows the differences in the nodal global parameter (), and the upper panel shows...
<p>The regional correlation strength of the nodes were redistributed and higher in healthy control c...
<p>Panels plot group-wise graph-theoretic metrics averaged over all connection densities considered....
<p>The node size indicates the number of topological properties with significant group differences. ...
<p>The node sizes indicate the significance of between-group differences in the regional efficiency....
<p>The FN-weighted network of each subject was constructed with different thresholds (T = 1,2,3,4,5)...
<p>The hub regions were identified if E<sub>nodal</sub>(i) was at least one SD greater than the mean...
<p>Note: The WM network with different connectivity metrics (FN-weighted, FA-weighted and binary net...
<p>Connections of cortical structural network for strategic/executive control with other networks me...
Brain regions with significant differences in local efficiency between the CCH and control groups (c...
<p>The “hubs” were redistributed and the nodes that were 1 SD over the mean regional efficiency tend...
<p>The node size indicates the number of basic properties with significant group differences. The no...
<p>Note: A corrected threshold of <i>P</i><0.05 corrected by FDR was taken as meaning that there was...
<p>Brain Regions with Significant Correlations between Node Global Efficiency and Scores from Remote...
<p>Shown are the nodes of the networks, defined in terms of regional connectivity strength (A) and r...
<p>The lower panel shows the differences in the nodal global parameter (), and the upper panel shows...
<p>The regional correlation strength of the nodes were redistributed and higher in healthy control c...
<p>Panels plot group-wise graph-theoretic metrics averaged over all connection densities considered....
<p>The node size indicates the number of topological properties with significant group differences. ...