<p>The “hubs” were redistributed and the nodes that were 1 SD over the mean regional efficiency tended to be in the same regions of the association and primary cortices in each group. The HE groups had lower percentages of regional efficiency in the primary cortex for the HE (B, C, D) patients compared with the healthy controls. Each box plot shows the range for the individual estimates of the regional correlation strength values in each group. The boxes are color coded to differentiate the primary sensory or motor cortex (red), heteromodal association cortex (blue), limbic or paralimbic cortex (orange), and subcortical nuclei (green).</p
<p>(A) The first cluster consisted of correlations between 5-HT<sub>2A</sub> receptor binding potent...
<p>Regions (brain templates of panels A for control and B T1DM subjects) in orange, green, blue, yel...
<p>Fifteen interregional cortical thickness correlations most accurately differentiate migraineurs a...
<p>The regional correlation strength of the nodes were redistributed and higher in healthy control c...
<p>Brain regions ranked in order of decreasing regional efficiency: “hubs” have high regional effici...
Brain regions with significant differences in local efficiency between the CCH and control groups (c...
<p>Regions showing patterns of reduced regional GM in patients compared to HS in both contralateral ...
<p>(A) global efficiency; (B) clustering coefficient; (C) characteristic path length; (D) local effi...
<p>The node sizes indicate the significance of between-group differences in the regional efficiency....
<p>Shown are the nodes of the networks, defined in terms of regional connectivity strength (A) and r...
<p>Brain regions exhibiting decreased and increased regional homogeneity among three groups.</p
<p>These matrices illustrate the interregional cortical thickness correlations amongst 70 brain regi...
<p>Brain Regions with Significant Correlations between Node Global Efficiency and Scores from Remote...
<p>A, histogram of mean nodal efficiency showed an evident shift towards overall decrease in patient...
<p>Red indicates increased connectivity and blue indicates decreased connectivity.</p
<p>(A) The first cluster consisted of correlations between 5-HT<sub>2A</sub> receptor binding potent...
<p>Regions (brain templates of panels A for control and B T1DM subjects) in orange, green, blue, yel...
<p>Fifteen interregional cortical thickness correlations most accurately differentiate migraineurs a...
<p>The regional correlation strength of the nodes were redistributed and higher in healthy control c...
<p>Brain regions ranked in order of decreasing regional efficiency: “hubs” have high regional effici...
Brain regions with significant differences in local efficiency between the CCH and control groups (c...
<p>Regions showing patterns of reduced regional GM in patients compared to HS in both contralateral ...
<p>(A) global efficiency; (B) clustering coefficient; (C) characteristic path length; (D) local effi...
<p>The node sizes indicate the significance of between-group differences in the regional efficiency....
<p>Shown are the nodes of the networks, defined in terms of regional connectivity strength (A) and r...
<p>Brain regions exhibiting decreased and increased regional homogeneity among three groups.</p
<p>These matrices illustrate the interregional cortical thickness correlations amongst 70 brain regi...
<p>Brain Regions with Significant Correlations between Node Global Efficiency and Scores from Remote...
<p>A, histogram of mean nodal efficiency showed an evident shift towards overall decrease in patient...
<p>Red indicates increased connectivity and blue indicates decreased connectivity.</p
<p>(A) The first cluster consisted of correlations between 5-HT<sub>2A</sub> receptor binding potent...
<p>Regions (brain templates of panels A for control and B T1DM subjects) in orange, green, blue, yel...
<p>Fifteen interregional cortical thickness correlations most accurately differentiate migraineurs a...