<p>(A) SRT distributions in the animal task show a higher peak of correct responses (thick lines) and a lower peak of incorrect responses (thin lines) when the context is congruent (vs. incongruent). A c2 test computed on Hits minus FA distributions revealed a difference between congruent and non-congruent responses starting at 160 ms indicated by the grey thick vertical line.(B) Accuracy as a function of median SRT shows a strong congruency effect in the animal task, an effect that is not seen in the vehicle task. Animals in congruent natural contexts are detected more accurately and faster than in incongruent manmade contexts.</p
<div><p>The congruency effect in distracter interference (e.g., Stroop) tasks is often reduced after...
<p>Target and distractor objects could belong to two different categories: means of transport (desig...
<p>Reaction time distributions were computed separately in the superordinate level task (green curve...
<p>(A, B) SRT distributions for correct (thick line) and incorrect (thin line) responses for each ta...
<p>Subjects' response (mean RT + SE, in ms) was significantly faster to visual targets presented on ...
International audienceWhereas most scientists agree that scene context can influence object recognit...
<p>Performance (left) and reaction times (right) for the congruent (blue) and incongruent (red) cond...
<p>Pane lA illustrates the mean RT as a function of congruency (C, I). It indicates a significant St...
<p>Each line represents performance of a single subject in each of the two conditions, which were pe...
<p>This Figure shows confidence intervals (p = .05) of the Congruency effects (as the respective dif...
<p>(Left) Mean inverse efficiency scores (IES), shown with standard errors (SE) for the detection of...
Visual scene context is well-known to facilitate the recognition of scene-congruent objects. Interes...
<p>The left panel shows mean accuracy, and the right panel shows reaction times. Stimulation was app...
<p>A, the measurements of reaction time (RT) and accurate rate (ACC) in time discrimination task. B,...
International audienceConflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads ...
<div><p>The congruency effect in distracter interference (e.g., Stroop) tasks is often reduced after...
<p>Target and distractor objects could belong to two different categories: means of transport (desig...
<p>Reaction time distributions were computed separately in the superordinate level task (green curve...
<p>(A, B) SRT distributions for correct (thick line) and incorrect (thin line) responses for each ta...
<p>Subjects' response (mean RT + SE, in ms) was significantly faster to visual targets presented on ...
International audienceWhereas most scientists agree that scene context can influence object recognit...
<p>Performance (left) and reaction times (right) for the congruent (blue) and incongruent (red) cond...
<p>Pane lA illustrates the mean RT as a function of congruency (C, I). It indicates a significant St...
<p>Each line represents performance of a single subject in each of the two conditions, which were pe...
<p>This Figure shows confidence intervals (p = .05) of the Congruency effects (as the respective dif...
<p>(Left) Mean inverse efficiency scores (IES), shown with standard errors (SE) for the detection of...
Visual scene context is well-known to facilitate the recognition of scene-congruent objects. Interes...
<p>The left panel shows mean accuracy, and the right panel shows reaction times. Stimulation was app...
<p>A, the measurements of reaction time (RT) and accurate rate (ACC) in time discrimination task. B,...
International audienceConflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads ...
<div><p>The congruency effect in distracter interference (e.g., Stroop) tasks is often reduced after...
<p>Target and distractor objects could belong to two different categories: means of transport (desig...
<p>Reaction time distributions were computed separately in the superordinate level task (green curve...