<p>Comparison of the treating performance among different model test solutions (pH = 7.05±0.25).</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Model comparison of H1, H2, and H3 for the four RQA measures for the O→R condition.</p
<p>Performance comparison of resulted fusion measures with IQA models that were used in optimisation...
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison of the performance of our models with that of LACE, assuming a 25% intervention rate.<...
<p>Comparison of model performances for the different use cases (prognosis periods of 2, 5, 8 and 11...
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
<p>Comparison between simulated results of three different models and experimental data for 5 wt-% e...
<p>Experimental results of 10 µg/L IBU and CIP mixed model test solutions (pH = 7.05±0.25).</p
<p>Performance comparisons between three different models using breast cancer datasets.</p
<p>Performance comparison of standard ALM results and 10-fold cross-validated (CV) ALM results.</p
Testing the models: Simulated vs. observed effect of comparator noise on test performance.</p
Model comparison of H1, H2, and H3 for the four RQA measures for the O→R condition.</p
<p>Comparison of model-generated single-cell AP characteristics with those measured from experiment....
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Model comparison of H1, H2, and H3 for the four RQA measures for the O→R condition.</p
<p>Performance comparison of resulted fusion measures with IQA models that were used in optimisation...
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison of the performance of our models with that of LACE, assuming a 25% intervention rate.<...
<p>Comparison of model performances for the different use cases (prognosis periods of 2, 5, 8 and 11...
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
<p>Comparison between simulated results of three different models and experimental data for 5 wt-% e...
<p>Experimental results of 10 µg/L IBU and CIP mixed model test solutions (pH = 7.05±0.25).</p
<p>Performance comparisons between three different models using breast cancer datasets.</p
<p>Performance comparison of standard ALM results and 10-fold cross-validated (CV) ALM results.</p
Testing the models: Simulated vs. observed effect of comparator noise on test performance.</p
Model comparison of H1, H2, and H3 for the four RQA measures for the O→R condition.</p
<p>Comparison of model-generated single-cell AP characteristics with those measured from experiment....
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Model comparison of H1, H2, and H3 for the four RQA measures for the O→R condition.</p
<p>Performance comparison of resulted fusion measures with IQA models that were used in optimisation...
DOI
Add to ORKG