<p>Clinical staging and survival data are reported as (<b>A</b>) gastrointestinal cancer, (<b>B</b>) urogenital cancer, (<b>C</b>) lung cancer and (<b>D</b>) head and neck cancer.</p
<p>Forest plot showing the meta-analysis of hazard ratios estimates for overall survival in gastric ...
This study was designed to analyze the prognostic significance of the staging system based on the ra...
<p>OS: overall survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; HR: hazard ra...
<p>Clinical staging and survival data are reported as (<b>A</b>) staging, (<b>B</b>) overall surviva...
<p>The result of meta-analysis for particular tumor types displayed instead of individual studies. F...
<p>Random effects model used for both outcomes, Relative weight of individual studies displayed in %...
<p>(A) Forrest plots of the included studies that evaluated the hazard ratios of high miR-155 expres...
<p>A: breast cancer cases and healthy controls; B: premenopausal breast cancer cases and healthy con...
<p>(a) sex (male vs female); (b) metastasis (M1 vs M0); (c) tumor size (T1/T2 vs T3/T4); (d) TNM sta...
<p>A meta-analysis of the data was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the methods and risk fa...
<p>GIC: Gastrointestinal cancer; GC: Gynecological cancer; BC: Breast cancer; HNC: Head and neck can...
<p>Overall meta-analysis (A), subgroup analysis according to antibodies used (B) and sensitivity ana...
<p>The prevalence of lymph node involvement, tumor size (T1–T2 vs T3–T4) and histological grade was ...
<p>A is the forest plot and B, C, and D are the “filled” funnel plots of OS, DFS, and the unclear gr...
<p>Summary of Association and Test of Homogeneity Results (a) and Forest Plots (b) for the Meta-Anal...
<p>Forest plot showing the meta-analysis of hazard ratios estimates for overall survival in gastric ...
This study was designed to analyze the prognostic significance of the staging system based on the ra...
<p>OS: overall survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; HR: hazard ra...
<p>Clinical staging and survival data are reported as (<b>A</b>) staging, (<b>B</b>) overall surviva...
<p>The result of meta-analysis for particular tumor types displayed instead of individual studies. F...
<p>Random effects model used for both outcomes, Relative weight of individual studies displayed in %...
<p>(A) Forrest plots of the included studies that evaluated the hazard ratios of high miR-155 expres...
<p>A: breast cancer cases and healthy controls; B: premenopausal breast cancer cases and healthy con...
<p>(a) sex (male vs female); (b) metastasis (M1 vs M0); (c) tumor size (T1/T2 vs T3/T4); (d) TNM sta...
<p>A meta-analysis of the data was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the methods and risk fa...
<p>GIC: Gastrointestinal cancer; GC: Gynecological cancer; BC: Breast cancer; HNC: Head and neck can...
<p>Overall meta-analysis (A), subgroup analysis according to antibodies used (B) and sensitivity ana...
<p>The prevalence of lymph node involvement, tumor size (T1–T2 vs T3–T4) and histological grade was ...
<p>A is the forest plot and B, C, and D are the “filled” funnel plots of OS, DFS, and the unclear gr...
<p>Summary of Association and Test of Homogeneity Results (a) and Forest Plots (b) for the Meta-Anal...
<p>Forest plot showing the meta-analysis of hazard ratios estimates for overall survival in gastric ...
This study was designed to analyze the prognostic significance of the staging system based on the ra...
<p>OS: overall survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; HR: hazard ra...