Figure S3. Parameter sensitivity analysis for the model. Illustration of the relative changes of the low-Nanog distribution ratio (blue bar), the average Oct4 level (green bar), and the average Nanog level of high-Nanog population (red bar). (TIFF 699Â kb
Figure S1. Dose–response curves for EC50 determination. Figure S2. Dose–response curves of solvent c...
Figure S1. The relative viability of hfNSCs in each group after 2 days of culture under self-renewal...
HCL analysis of the union of DE genes during AB-erythroblast maturation in SEM-F or SEM-i, as descri...
Table S2. Parameters used in Eq. (2) for the simplified Oct4-Nanog model. (DOCX 42Â kb
Figure S2. The simplified two-dimensional Oct4-Nanog model on the phase plate and the distribution o...
Figure S6. Three different strategies of reprogramming demonstrate additional Nanog activation is ne...
Figure S5. The MAP of the reprogramming process in the WT model. The MAP (white curve) starting from...
BackgroundHeterogeneous gene expressions of cells are widely observed in self-renewing pluripotent s...
Figure S4. Gene expression centroids from the adult FBS erythropoiesis data as depicted in Fig. 1B....
Autophagy modulated the adverse effect of HPC for 48 h on BM-MSCs. (A) Representative TUNEL images o...
In vitro differentiation analysis and karyotyping of LiPSC. (A) Representative karyotype of the esta...
Additional file 3: Supplementary Fig. 1. Reprograming efficiency and doubling time of iPSCs, related...
Figure S1. The IC50 of the 3 drugs were calculated for the 3 mesenchymal-like cell lines used in thi...
Figure S1. Schematic of nanopattern fabrication used in this study. Figure S2. Polarization graph of...
Figure S2. The patient-derived GBM cells displayed a higher level of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2. A, Represent...
Figure S1. Dose–response curves for EC50 determination. Figure S2. Dose–response curves of solvent c...
Figure S1. The relative viability of hfNSCs in each group after 2 days of culture under self-renewal...
HCL analysis of the union of DE genes during AB-erythroblast maturation in SEM-F or SEM-i, as descri...
Table S2. Parameters used in Eq. (2) for the simplified Oct4-Nanog model. (DOCX 42Â kb
Figure S2. The simplified two-dimensional Oct4-Nanog model on the phase plate and the distribution o...
Figure S6. Three different strategies of reprogramming demonstrate additional Nanog activation is ne...
Figure S5. The MAP of the reprogramming process in the WT model. The MAP (white curve) starting from...
BackgroundHeterogeneous gene expressions of cells are widely observed in self-renewing pluripotent s...
Figure S4. Gene expression centroids from the adult FBS erythropoiesis data as depicted in Fig. 1B....
Autophagy modulated the adverse effect of HPC for 48 h on BM-MSCs. (A) Representative TUNEL images o...
In vitro differentiation analysis and karyotyping of LiPSC. (A) Representative karyotype of the esta...
Additional file 3: Supplementary Fig. 1. Reprograming efficiency and doubling time of iPSCs, related...
Figure S1. The IC50 of the 3 drugs were calculated for the 3 mesenchymal-like cell lines used in thi...
Figure S1. Schematic of nanopattern fabrication used in this study. Figure S2. Polarization graph of...
Figure S2. The patient-derived GBM cells displayed a higher level of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2. A, Represent...
Figure S1. Dose–response curves for EC50 determination. Figure S2. Dose–response curves of solvent c...
Figure S1. The relative viability of hfNSCs in each group after 2 days of culture under self-renewal...
HCL analysis of the union of DE genes during AB-erythroblast maturation in SEM-F or SEM-i, as descri...
DOI
Add to ORKG