<p>Mean recognition rate on the memory tasks for each condition, as well as Bayes factor (BF) and effect size for dual task in Experiments 1A, 1B, and 1C.</p
<p>Recognition memory testing for face identity with respect to valence effects.</p
<p>Memory performance as a function of the targets to be retrieved under the different attention con...
In distinct experiments we examined memories for orientation and size. After viewing a randomly orie...
<p>Mean recognition rate on the memory tasks for each condition, as well as Bayes factor (BF) and ef...
<p>Mean recognition performance (+ SEM) of the minimal sensory stimulation groups (wakeful rest dela...
<p>Memory performance as a function of the targets to be retrieved under the different attention con...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms), accuracy (ACC), and standard errors (<i>SE</i>) for memory task in Expe...
<p>Full attention = 100%.</p>*<p>In these experiments, we tested part of the learning of the studied...
<p>Mean recognition latencies (in milliseconds) for positive and negative words as a function of exp...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms), accuracy (ACC), and standard errors (<i>SE</i>) for memory task in Expe...
<p>In Experiment 1 (a), performance on all memory types was higher for the Kanizsa condition (dark b...
<p>Recognition is indicated by the mean proportion of “old” judgments on theme words ( = False memor...
<p>P values and effect sizes (in parentheses) from paired-sample t-tests between each pair of expres...
<p>The mean (), standard deviation (), and the ratio () of the recognition rates (%) for MR_2DLDA wh...
<p>Recognition memory testing for face identity with respect to valence effects.</p
<p>Memory performance as a function of the targets to be retrieved under the different attention con...
In distinct experiments we examined memories for orientation and size. After viewing a randomly orie...
<p>Mean recognition rate on the memory tasks for each condition, as well as Bayes factor (BF) and ef...
<p>Mean recognition performance (+ SEM) of the minimal sensory stimulation groups (wakeful rest dela...
<p>Memory performance as a function of the targets to be retrieved under the different attention con...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms), accuracy (ACC), and standard errors (<i>SE</i>) for memory task in Expe...
<p>Full attention = 100%.</p>*<p>In these experiments, we tested part of the learning of the studied...
<p>Mean recognition latencies (in milliseconds) for positive and negative words as a function of exp...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms), accuracy (ACC), and standard errors (<i>SE</i>) for memory task in Expe...
<p>In Experiment 1 (a), performance on all memory types was higher for the Kanizsa condition (dark b...
<p>Recognition is indicated by the mean proportion of “old” judgments on theme words ( = False memor...
<p>P values and effect sizes (in parentheses) from paired-sample t-tests between each pair of expres...
<p>The mean (), standard deviation (), and the ratio () of the recognition rates (%) for MR_2DLDA wh...
<p>Recognition memory testing for face identity with respect to valence effects.</p
<p>Memory performance as a function of the targets to be retrieved under the different attention con...
In distinct experiments we examined memories for orientation and size. After viewing a randomly orie...
DOI
Add to ORKG