<p>(A) List of mature miR-30 family members. Homologous nucleotides among miR-30a/d/e or between miR-30b/c were shown in bold. (B) Base pairing prediction between miR-30 and target sequences in the 3′-UTR of <i>SPP1/osteopontin, HSPA5/GRP78, LIFR, EED, PCGF5, SIRT1 and CTGF/CCN2.</i> Note that targeting can be shared among some family members. Positions in 3′-UTR were shown below the sequences.</p
<div><p>(A) Diagrams of 3′ UTR conservation in six drosophilid genomes (horizontal black bars) and t...
<p>The cleavage sites were determined by 5′ RLM-RACE. The nucleotide positions of the miRNA compleme...
(A) The interaction site of circMEF2A1 and miR-30a-3p is conserved in humans, mice, and chickens. (B...
<p>Note that miR -3065, -944 and -149-5p all were down-regulated and share multiple common targets (...
<p><b>A</b>. γ-Synuclein 3′-UTR. Arrows shows a short form of the UTR (UTR-S). The short form does n...
<p><b>(A)</b> GO analysis of predicted miR-30 targets (TargetScan 6.2) is shown sorted by <i>P</i>-v...
<p>Nucleotide sequence conservation between the 3′ UTRs of human and the closest mouse or rat orthol...
<p>TargetScan was utilized for the prediction of targets and scoring. Listed factors are selected un...
<p>(a) Representative eight base pair complementarity between formin target gene and miR-335. (b) Th...
The predicted target genes of the universally expressed miRNAs in the 27 PCNSL specimens.</p
<p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of hPGRN mRNA (NM_002087.2 showing with the predicted miR-29b...
<p>* P<sub>CT,</sub> the probability of conserved targeting.</p><p>Predicted miR-27a Targets among D...
A: Binding position prediction of 3’UTRs of DNMT3A, DNMT3B and SP1 with miR29b by TargetScan. B and ...
<p>Ticks under algorithm names indicate the successful prediction of each miRNA-mRNA pair per predic...
<p>The total context score is based on six features: site-type contribution, 3' pairing contribution...
<div><p>(A) Diagrams of 3′ UTR conservation in six drosophilid genomes (horizontal black bars) and t...
<p>The cleavage sites were determined by 5′ RLM-RACE. The nucleotide positions of the miRNA compleme...
(A) The interaction site of circMEF2A1 and miR-30a-3p is conserved in humans, mice, and chickens. (B...
<p>Note that miR -3065, -944 and -149-5p all were down-regulated and share multiple common targets (...
<p><b>A</b>. γ-Synuclein 3′-UTR. Arrows shows a short form of the UTR (UTR-S). The short form does n...
<p><b>(A)</b> GO analysis of predicted miR-30 targets (TargetScan 6.2) is shown sorted by <i>P</i>-v...
<p>Nucleotide sequence conservation between the 3′ UTRs of human and the closest mouse or rat orthol...
<p>TargetScan was utilized for the prediction of targets and scoring. Listed factors are selected un...
<p>(a) Representative eight base pair complementarity between formin target gene and miR-335. (b) Th...
The predicted target genes of the universally expressed miRNAs in the 27 PCNSL specimens.</p
<p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of hPGRN mRNA (NM_002087.2 showing with the predicted miR-29b...
<p>* P<sub>CT,</sub> the probability of conserved targeting.</p><p>Predicted miR-27a Targets among D...
A: Binding position prediction of 3’UTRs of DNMT3A, DNMT3B and SP1 with miR29b by TargetScan. B and ...
<p>Ticks under algorithm names indicate the successful prediction of each miRNA-mRNA pair per predic...
<p>The total context score is based on six features: site-type contribution, 3' pairing contribution...
<div><p>(A) Diagrams of 3′ UTR conservation in six drosophilid genomes (horizontal black bars) and t...
<p>The cleavage sites were determined by 5′ RLM-RACE. The nucleotide positions of the miRNA compleme...
(A) The interaction site of circMEF2A1 and miR-30a-3p is conserved in humans, mice, and chickens. (B...