<p>The top panel shows the ratio of pairs identified as low quality versus all pairs analyzed for each method. The total number of pairs in each dataset is shown in the bottom panel.</p
<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...
<p>The <i>p</i> values that smaller than 0.05 in each column are in bold font.</p><p>The comparison ...
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
<p>Statistical comparison of the efficacy of different minimotif filters and filter combinations.</p
<p>The top panel shows the relative number of 97% OTUs for each method, with the method that produce...
<p>The mean quality scores of paired-end reads from the numbered regions in Venn diagrams are shown ...
Comparison of the groups of participants with satisfactory (selected) versus unsatisfactory (filtere...
<p>It shows the comparison results of the regression based on classification, SVM direct regression,...
<p>Comparison of the obtained results for the different detection algorithms (considering all the sa...
<p>The filters with the lowest γ-index have the highest performance. This correlation is highly sign...
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
We compare four common data collection techniques to elicit preferences: the rating of items, the ra...
<p>TP, FP and FN for each algorithm. Note that each plot has a different scale, which is very low in...
<p>Note: (1/2/3/4/5) represented the scores of indexes for subjective evaluation.</p><p>Comparison o...
<p>Comparison of detection rate using 3 Methods on KITTI and DETRAC datasets.</p
<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...
<p>The <i>p</i> values that smaller than 0.05 in each column are in bold font.</p><p>The comparison ...
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
<p>Statistical comparison of the efficacy of different minimotif filters and filter combinations.</p
<p>The top panel shows the relative number of 97% OTUs for each method, with the method that produce...
<p>The mean quality scores of paired-end reads from the numbered regions in Venn diagrams are shown ...
Comparison of the groups of participants with satisfactory (selected) versus unsatisfactory (filtere...
<p>It shows the comparison results of the regression based on classification, SVM direct regression,...
<p>Comparison of the obtained results for the different detection algorithms (considering all the sa...
<p>The filters with the lowest γ-index have the highest performance. This correlation is highly sign...
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
We compare four common data collection techniques to elicit preferences: the rating of items, the ra...
<p>TP, FP and FN for each algorithm. Note that each plot has a different scale, which is very low in...
<p>Note: (1/2/3/4/5) represented the scores of indexes for subjective evaluation.</p><p>Comparison o...
<p>Comparison of detection rate using 3 Methods on KITTI and DETRAC datasets.</p
<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...
<p>The <i>p</i> values that smaller than 0.05 in each column are in bold font.</p><p>The comparison ...
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG