<p>(a) Correlation between LB deviations and LM scores at baseline. (b) Effect of cTBS of rAG on sham-normalised LB and LM performance (i.e. rAG minus sham). (c) Effect of rAG cTBS on LB and LM performance in each ‘right deviant’ subject. Error bars = ±1 standard error.</p
<p>(a) Muscle activation level of 40%MVC. (b) Muscle activation level of 80%MVC. Error bars in the r...
<p>5-HIAA levels in the pathologically advanced Lewy body disorder (LBD) group (Braak LB stages ≥3) ...
The problem of calculating error bars in within-subject designs has proven to be a difficult problem...
<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LM scores in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of rAG ...
<p>(a) Correlation between LB deviations at baseline and following sham cTBS. (b) Correlation betwee...
<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LB deviations in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of ...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>Mean and standard errors of the scores on performance (Panel A) and susceptibility to temptation ...
<p>A) Group averaged performance variability across all testing blocks. B) Performance variability l...
<p>A single session of premotor cTBS600 significantly reduced the motor plasticity produced by cTBS3...
<p>The performance error (A) and success rate (B) were averaged per group and are indicated with bar...
<p>Normalized density of each cell phenotype versus substrate stiffness during identical times as a ...
<p>A) Group averaged mean performance across all testing blocks. B) Mean performance learning rates....
<p>Peak3, Peak4 and Peak6 decreased, whereas Peak5 increased associated with the severity of LCMM di...
<p>Error bar indicates ±1 standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.</p
<p>(a) Muscle activation level of 40%MVC. (b) Muscle activation level of 80%MVC. Error bars in the r...
<p>5-HIAA levels in the pathologically advanced Lewy body disorder (LBD) group (Braak LB stages ≥3) ...
The problem of calculating error bars in within-subject designs has proven to be a difficult problem...
<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LM scores in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of rAG ...
<p>(a) Correlation between LB deviations at baseline and following sham cTBS. (b) Correlation betwee...
<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LB deviations in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of ...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>Mean and standard errors of the scores on performance (Panel A) and susceptibility to temptation ...
<p>A) Group averaged performance variability across all testing blocks. B) Performance variability l...
<p>A single session of premotor cTBS600 significantly reduced the motor plasticity produced by cTBS3...
<p>The performance error (A) and success rate (B) were averaged per group and are indicated with bar...
<p>Normalized density of each cell phenotype versus substrate stiffness during identical times as a ...
<p>A) Group averaged mean performance across all testing blocks. B) Mean performance learning rates....
<p>Peak3, Peak4 and Peak6 decreased, whereas Peak5 increased associated with the severity of LCMM di...
<p>Error bar indicates ±1 standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.</p
<p>(a) Muscle activation level of 40%MVC. (b) Muscle activation level of 80%MVC. Error bars in the r...
<p>5-HIAA levels in the pathologically advanced Lewy body disorder (LBD) group (Braak LB stages ≥3) ...
The problem of calculating error bars in within-subject designs has proven to be a difficult problem...
DOI
Add to ORKG