<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LM scores in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of rAG cTBS on LB in right and left deviants. (c) Effects of cTBS on LM latencies in left and right deviants. Error bars = ±1 standard error.</p
<p>A) Group averaged performance variability across all testing blocks. B) Performance variability l...
20T: 20 Test. PRE: before cTBS; t0: immediately after cTBS; t20: 20 minutes after cTBS; t40: 40 minu...
<p>Group means of individual hit rates for A and AV conditions are plotted as a function of deviant ...
<p>(a) Correlation between LB deviations and LM scores at baseline. (b) Effect of cTBS of rAG on sha...
<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LB deviations in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of ...
<p>A single session of premotor cTBS600 significantly reduced the motor plasticity produced by cTBS3...
<p>Subjects’ accuracy on 40 trials of the ongoing task after the application of cTBS over left BA10 ...
Effects of cerebellar cTBS on cerebellar cortical inhibition (CBI) in controls (A) and patients (B)....
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>The figure demonstrates how punishment helps in adapting to conflict, for low punishment-sensitiv...
<p>The figure depicts the effect of drug on the response latency in the performance of the Hayling S...
<p>The motor plasticity-like effect induced by cTBS300 given to M1 was significantly reduced or abol...
<p>There was a genotype group×block interaction for rich hit rates (A). AA homozygotes (black bars) ...
<p>The more negative M-duration difference reflects a stronger transfer of learning effect. Error ba...
<p>Results presented as mean± standard error.</p><p>Control, ES, AFS, CTB: see text.</p><p>N = 6 for...
<p>A) Group averaged performance variability across all testing blocks. B) Performance variability l...
20T: 20 Test. PRE: before cTBS; t0: immediately after cTBS; t20: 20 minutes after cTBS; t40: 40 minu...
<p>Group means of individual hit rates for A and AV conditions are plotted as a function of deviant ...
<p>(a) Correlation between LB deviations and LM scores at baseline. (b) Effect of cTBS of rAG on sha...
<p>(a) Effect of cTBS on LB deviations in left and right deviants. (b) Time course of the effect of ...
<p>A single session of premotor cTBS600 significantly reduced the motor plasticity produced by cTBS3...
<p>Subjects’ accuracy on 40 trials of the ongoing task after the application of cTBS over left BA10 ...
Effects of cerebellar cTBS on cerebellar cortical inhibition (CBI) in controls (A) and patients (B)....
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>The figure demonstrates how punishment helps in adapting to conflict, for low punishment-sensitiv...
<p>The figure depicts the effect of drug on the response latency in the performance of the Hayling S...
<p>The motor plasticity-like effect induced by cTBS300 given to M1 was significantly reduced or abol...
<p>There was a genotype group×block interaction for rich hit rates (A). AA homozygotes (black bars) ...
<p>The more negative M-duration difference reflects a stronger transfer of learning effect. Error ba...
<p>Results presented as mean± standard error.</p><p>Control, ES, AFS, CTB: see text.</p><p>N = 6 for...
<p>A) Group averaged performance variability across all testing blocks. B) Performance variability l...
20T: 20 Test. PRE: before cTBS; t0: immediately after cTBS; t20: 20 minutes after cTBS; t40: 40 minu...
<p>Group means of individual hit rates for A and AV conditions are plotted as a function of deviant ...
DOI
Add to ORKG