<p>Total (and percentage) of voxels where model is the most favoured model (ie. has the largest posterior expected frequency ).</p
<p>Comparison of pairwise linear models for response times and response levels data.</p
<p>The rank of preference PS is “PS5 = best-fit PS>PS2 = PS3>PS4>PS1”. HM: harmonic mean; M1: model ...
<p>Each panel shows the marginal posterior distributions over a single parameter for each subject an...
<p>The maps show voxels where pre- versus post-stimulus activity is best discriminated by each model...
<p>For each model we average the posterior expected frequencies across all voxels in each ROI (FFG ...
<p>Comparison among the fit indexes of the three hypothesized models carried out on the whole sample...
<p>Each bar represents, the proportion of the experimental models out of the 100 fitted in which the...
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison of the average discrepancy of all seven models by incorporating empirical data across all...
Comparison between the number of voxels/octants used to achieve a resolution with a homogenous voxel...
<p>Comparison of the best results obtained for each data set over both models (Cox and RSF) and all ...
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>Comparison of pairwise linear models for response times and response levels data.</p
<p>The rank of preference PS is “PS5 = best-fit PS>PS2 = PS3>PS4>PS1”. HM: harmonic mean; M1: model ...
<p>Each panel shows the marginal posterior distributions over a single parameter for each subject an...
<p>The maps show voxels where pre- versus post-stimulus activity is best discriminated by each model...
<p>For each model we average the posterior expected frequencies across all voxels in each ROI (FFG ...
<p>Comparison among the fit indexes of the three hypothesized models carried out on the whole sample...
<p>Each bar represents, the proportion of the experimental models out of the 100 fitted in which the...
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison of the average discrepancy of all seven models by incorporating empirical data across all...
Comparison between the number of voxels/octants used to achieve a resolution with a homogenous voxel...
<p>Comparison of the best results obtained for each data set over both models (Cox and RSF) and all ...
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>Comparison of pairwise linear models for response times and response levels data.</p
<p>The rank of preference PS is “PS5 = best-fit PS>PS2 = PS3>PS4>PS1”. HM: harmonic mean; M1: model ...
<p>Each panel shows the marginal posterior distributions over a single parameter for each subject an...
DOI
Add to ORKG