<p>Mean ± SEM. P CKD vs. CON = 0.0011, P Interventions = 0.0028, P Interaction = 0.0014, for panel A; P CKD vs. CON = NS, P Interventions = NS, P Interaction = NS for panel B). Tukey post-hoc test for comparison between groups: ### P<0.01 vs. CON. Between groups: *P<0.05. **P<0.01 ***P<0.001.</p
<p>(A) Geometric mean infarct volumes are compared among groups after log transformation to achieve ...
<p>A, B: Photographs of coronal brain sections of rats in control group (A) and 24h group (B) with 2...
<p>This analysis is based on a subset (n = 370) of the total sample of animals. Behavioral responses...
<p>Mean ± SEM. P CON vs. CKD = NS; P Interventions = 0.003; P Interaction = NS. Tukey post hoc t...
<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.020, P vehicle vs. baseline = NS, P Interaction...
<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.001, P Tempol vs. baseline <0.001, P Interaction ...
<p>Values are mean ± SE. n = 12 for each group.</p><p>*P<0.05 compared with INT.</p
<p>CM treatment decreased tubular fibrosis and atrophy (A). Differences between CKD (B) and healthy ...
<p>Representative illustrations of infarct size as stained by Evans Blue and TTC (a). LA decreased i...
(A) Representative images of the TTC staining at different time points in the control, sham, model a...
<p>EC rats had more CKB activity compared to IC rats and stress increases CKB activity. The bar grap...
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.</p><p>Control: Placebo-treated (SO-P) + sham-o...
<p>Data presented as means ± SD (n = 5).</p><p><sup>a</sup> indicates a significant difference compa...
<p>X-axis represents treatment groups (n = 8/group): Vehicle control (white bars □), Valproic Acid (...
<p>(A) Typical tracings of rCBF, where “T” in a, b and c indicates the onset time of different treat...
<p>(A) Geometric mean infarct volumes are compared among groups after log transformation to achieve ...
<p>A, B: Photographs of coronal brain sections of rats in control group (A) and 24h group (B) with 2...
<p>This analysis is based on a subset (n = 370) of the total sample of animals. Behavioral responses...
<p>Mean ± SEM. P CON vs. CKD = NS; P Interventions = 0.003; P Interaction = NS. Tukey post hoc t...
<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.020, P vehicle vs. baseline = NS, P Interaction...
<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.001, P Tempol vs. baseline <0.001, P Interaction ...
<p>Values are mean ± SE. n = 12 for each group.</p><p>*P<0.05 compared with INT.</p
<p>CM treatment decreased tubular fibrosis and atrophy (A). Differences between CKD (B) and healthy ...
<p>Representative illustrations of infarct size as stained by Evans Blue and TTC (a). LA decreased i...
(A) Representative images of the TTC staining at different time points in the control, sham, model a...
<p>EC rats had more CKB activity compared to IC rats and stress increases CKB activity. The bar grap...
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.</p><p>Control: Placebo-treated (SO-P) + sham-o...
<p>Data presented as means ± SD (n = 5).</p><p><sup>a</sup> indicates a significant difference compa...
<p>X-axis represents treatment groups (n = 8/group): Vehicle control (white bars □), Valproic Acid (...
<p>(A) Typical tracings of rCBF, where “T” in a, b and c indicates the onset time of different treat...
<p>(A) Geometric mean infarct volumes are compared among groups after log transformation to achieve ...
<p>A, B: Photographs of coronal brain sections of rats in control group (A) and 24h group (B) with 2...
<p>This analysis is based on a subset (n = 370) of the total sample of animals. Behavioral responses...