<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.001, P Tempol vs. baseline <0.001, P Interaction = 0,002 for panel A; P CKD vs. CON = 0.030, P Tempol vs. baseline = NS, P Interaction = NS for panel B), ## P<0.01, ### P<0.001 vs. CON. $$$ P<0.001 vs. baseline (paired observations).</p
<p>HW: heart weight; BW: body weight; MAP: mean arterial pressure; LV: left ventricle; LVSP: left ve...
<p>Unit is ml/g/min.</p><p>*<sup>a</sup>unit converted to ml/g/min with 1 g/ml density.</p><p>*<sup>...
<p>Typical pressure-volume loops obtained by conductance catheter from a sham operated non-pregnant ...
<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.020, P vehicle vs. baseline = NS, P Interaction...
<p>Mean ± SEM. P CKD vs. CON = 0.0011, P Interventions = 0.0028, P Interaction = 0.0014, for panel A...
<p>The groups and the time points defined in the text, Data are means ± standard deviation (SD),</p>...
<p>MAP was significantly increased in AngII+Sed compared with Sal+Sed rats from day 8 of AngII infus...
Responses to hemorrhagic arterial pressure reduction in different ischemic renal failure models. Ren...
<p><i>A</i>. Representative blood pressure tracings of DSS rats from different groups, <i>B</i>. Qua...
<p>Values are expressed as mean±SEM. In each group, values in <i>parentheses</i> represent <i>n</i>....
<p>SHAM (n = 20), CAST (n = 23), PHYSIO (n = 20), and SUPRA (n = 23) groups. The values are expresse...
<p>Effect of exogenous rUII (6 pmol. min<sup>-1</sup>. 100 g bwt<sup>-1</sup>, solid bars, n = 7 per...
textabstractThe responses to changes in renal perfusion pressure (RPP) were compared in 12...
<p>Mean ± SEM. P CON vs. CKD = NS; P Interventions = 0.003; P Interaction = NS. Tukey post hoc t...
<p>Increased MAP caused a greater change in RVR and conductance of RGS2+/+ relative to RGS2-/- mice....
<p>HW: heart weight; BW: body weight; MAP: mean arterial pressure; LV: left ventricle; LVSP: left ve...
<p>Unit is ml/g/min.</p><p>*<sup>a</sup>unit converted to ml/g/min with 1 g/ml density.</p><p>*<sup>...
<p>Typical pressure-volume loops obtained by conductance catheter from a sham operated non-pregnant ...
<p>Mean ± SEM. Two-way RM ANOVA (P CKD vs. CON = 0.020, P vehicle vs. baseline = NS, P Interaction...
<p>Mean ± SEM. P CKD vs. CON = 0.0011, P Interventions = 0.0028, P Interaction = 0.0014, for panel A...
<p>The groups and the time points defined in the text, Data are means ± standard deviation (SD),</p>...
<p>MAP was significantly increased in AngII+Sed compared with Sal+Sed rats from day 8 of AngII infus...
Responses to hemorrhagic arterial pressure reduction in different ischemic renal failure models. Ren...
<p><i>A</i>. Representative blood pressure tracings of DSS rats from different groups, <i>B</i>. Qua...
<p>Values are expressed as mean±SEM. In each group, values in <i>parentheses</i> represent <i>n</i>....
<p>SHAM (n = 20), CAST (n = 23), PHYSIO (n = 20), and SUPRA (n = 23) groups. The values are expresse...
<p>Effect of exogenous rUII (6 pmol. min<sup>-1</sup>. 100 g bwt<sup>-1</sup>, solid bars, n = 7 per...
textabstractThe responses to changes in renal perfusion pressure (RPP) were compared in 12...
<p>Mean ± SEM. P CON vs. CKD = NS; P Interventions = 0.003; P Interaction = NS. Tukey post hoc t...
<p>Increased MAP caused a greater change in RVR and conductance of RGS2+/+ relative to RGS2-/- mice....
<p>HW: heart weight; BW: body weight; MAP: mean arterial pressure; LV: left ventricle; LVSP: left ve...
<p>Unit is ml/g/min.</p><p>*<sup>a</sup>unit converted to ml/g/min with 1 g/ml density.</p><p>*<sup>...
<p>Typical pressure-volume loops obtained by conductance catheter from a sham operated non-pregnant ...