<p>Perfect balance would be if researchers reside on the 1∶1 line, since then they provide the same number of reviews as their submissions require. Red data points indicate individuals whose over- or under-contribution is unlikely to have resulted from chance (p>0.05, binomial test). Blue data points indicate p>0.05, though note that tests for individuals close to the origin have low statistical power. Panel (a) corresponds with the assumption that reviews are distributed equally among co-authors, (b) with the assumption that the submitting author is responsible for all reviews. Inset: dynamics of proportion of researchers over-contributing by more than double (upper line) or under-contributing by less than half (lower line). Axes of the ma...
Our scientific community faces a sort of paradox. A large bulk of work has been done on data-oriente...
<div><p>Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments,...
<p>(A.) Respondents reported their past experience evaluating other researchers in each context; res...
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and “withdraw” fro...
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and ‘‘withdraw’ ’ ...
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and "withdraw" fro...
<p><b>The rank-citation profiles for individual researchers (upper panels) and research teams (lower...
<p>Graph of relationships between the researcher expectations shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.o...
<p>Lines are predictions from a quasibinomial response variable model with number of submissions, ye...
<div><p>Peer review represents the primary mechanism used by funding agencies to allocate financial ...
Background One of the most important weaknesses of the peer review process is that different revi...
<p>Each panel is a plot of the cumulative proportion of time each individual spends solving problems...
Numeric review scores appear in many peer review settings. Summary statistics of those numeric score...
The graph shows the proportion of responsible and not responsible authors in each author position. T...
Frequency of individual scores: Blue line includes all responses, N = 6604, and an average score, S,...
Our scientific community faces a sort of paradox. A large bulk of work has been done on data-oriente...
<div><p>Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments,...
<p>(A.) Respondents reported their past experience evaluating other researchers in each context; res...
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and “withdraw” fro...
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and ‘‘withdraw’ ’ ...
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and "withdraw" fro...
<p><b>The rank-citation profiles for individual researchers (upper panels) and research teams (lower...
<p>Graph of relationships between the researcher expectations shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.o...
<p>Lines are predictions from a quasibinomial response variable model with number of submissions, ye...
<div><p>Peer review represents the primary mechanism used by funding agencies to allocate financial ...
Background One of the most important weaknesses of the peer review process is that different revi...
<p>Each panel is a plot of the cumulative proportion of time each individual spends solving problems...
Numeric review scores appear in many peer review settings. Summary statistics of those numeric score...
The graph shows the proportion of responsible and not responsible authors in each author position. T...
Frequency of individual scores: Blue line includes all responses, N = 6604, and an average score, S,...
Our scientific community faces a sort of paradox. A large bulk of work has been done on data-oriente...
<div><p>Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments,...
<p>(A.) Respondents reported their past experience evaluating other researchers in each context; res...