<p>(A.) Respondents reported their past experience evaluating other researchers in each context; respondents could select more than one item. Respondents reported (B.) how much trust each data publication feature inspires, (C.) how useful each metric would be for assessing impact, and (D.) how valuable a CV item each kind of data publication would be. White dots show the mean response for each item; error bars depict bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals.</p
In today's networked digital environment, is the peer review system the best way to recognize qualit...
Data “publication ” seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed liter-ature...
Peer review is intended to support the quality and standards of academic work. The peer review...
<p>Respondents conveyed the expectations raised by the terms (A.) publication and (B.) peer review i...
2. Keep these quotes in mind: "Some experts think peer review validates published research. For...
Assessing the quality of research is of critical importance. In this article I will discuss various ...
<p>Respondents indicated (A.) how a dataset creator should be credited, (B.) how they actually credi...
This short note adds to the debate on the most effective way in which to measure research quality. A...
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, y...
Accountability to authors and readers cannot exist without proper peer review practices. Thus, the i...
Peer review is the defining feature of scholarly communication. In a 2018 survey of more than 11,000...
<div><p>Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments,...
The goal for the peer review of manuscripts is usually to select the “best ” from the work submitted...
Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments, little ...
This paper describes, and lays out an argument for, the use of a procedure to help groups of reviewe...
In today's networked digital environment, is the peer review system the best way to recognize qualit...
Data “publication ” seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed liter-ature...
Peer review is intended to support the quality and standards of academic work. The peer review...
<p>Respondents conveyed the expectations raised by the terms (A.) publication and (B.) peer review i...
2. Keep these quotes in mind: "Some experts think peer review validates published research. For...
Assessing the quality of research is of critical importance. In this article I will discuss various ...
<p>Respondents indicated (A.) how a dataset creator should be credited, (B.) how they actually credi...
This short note adds to the debate on the most effective way in which to measure research quality. A...
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, y...
Accountability to authors and readers cannot exist without proper peer review practices. Thus, the i...
Peer review is the defining feature of scholarly communication. In a 2018 survey of more than 11,000...
<div><p>Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments,...
The goal for the peer review of manuscripts is usually to select the “best ” from the work submitted...
Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments, little ...
This paper describes, and lays out an argument for, the use of a procedure to help groups of reviewe...
In today's networked digital environment, is the peer review system the best way to recognize qualit...
Data “publication ” seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed liter-ature...
Peer review is intended to support the quality and standards of academic work. The peer review...