<p>Comparison of running time (seconds) of the algorithms implemented in MATLAB (upper section) and other platforms (lower section) for two real datasets respectively.</p
Shows the mean operation time of each algorithm on Oxford dataset in units of seconds.</p
<p>There are 20000 and 7000 samples in the Testing-A of hg19 and mm10 respectively.</p><p>Computatio...
<p>Each value is the average time in seconds for 10 independent runs.</p><p>Comparison of the comput...
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p>Timing (in seconds) for different Matlab implementations of demosaicing algorithms on the 512×768...
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>The unit of the table is seconds for the first nine columns and minutes for the last dataset (kdd...
(a) The run time as a function of spike train length using Knight’s method (black), our method (red)...
<p>The statement of each left box is the MATLAB command lines executed in the corresponding filter. ...
<p>The comparison solving time (s) of two algorithms with coefficient varying.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
(A) Run time for different sample numbers on a fixed set of genes using real data. (B) Run time for ...
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
<p>A comparison of running times of TPA(FCED), RLA and RLA-CL on simulated data sets (generated with...
<p>Computation time (in seconds) for several implementations of the evaluated clustering algorithms ...
Shows the mean operation time of each algorithm on Oxford dataset in units of seconds.</p
<p>There are 20000 and 7000 samples in the Testing-A of hg19 and mm10 respectively.</p><p>Computatio...
<p>Each value is the average time in seconds for 10 independent runs.</p><p>Comparison of the comput...
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p>Timing (in seconds) for different Matlab implementations of demosaicing algorithms on the 512×768...
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>The unit of the table is seconds for the first nine columns and minutes for the last dataset (kdd...
(a) The run time as a function of spike train length using Knight’s method (black), our method (red)...
<p>The statement of each left box is the MATLAB command lines executed in the corresponding filter. ...
<p>The comparison solving time (s) of two algorithms with coefficient varying.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
(A) Run time for different sample numbers on a fixed set of genes using real data. (B) Run time for ...
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
<p>A comparison of running times of TPA(FCED), RLA and RLA-CL on simulated data sets (generated with...
<p>Computation time (in seconds) for several implementations of the evaluated clustering algorithms ...
Shows the mean operation time of each algorithm on Oxford dataset in units of seconds.</p
<p>There are 20000 and 7000 samples in the Testing-A of hg19 and mm10 respectively.</p><p>Computatio...
<p>Each value is the average time in seconds for 10 independent runs.</p><p>Comparison of the comput...