<p>The comparison solving time (s) of two algorithms with coefficient varying.</p
<p>The execution time of the three methods against different numbers of new data points.</p
<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p
<p>Comparison of the computation speed for the Improved SIFT and the Original SIFT.</p
<p>A comparison between numerical and exact solutions at different time levels.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>Comparison of time and computing resources used by the compared binning methods.</p
<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
<p>Comparison of running time (seconds) of the algorithms implemented in MATLAB (upper section) and ...
<p>Computation Time (In CPU Seconds) For Different Methods With Different Noise Densities.</p
<p>Comparison of encryption time between our proposed method and some other cryptosystems.</p
<p>A comparison between the average processing time of different segmentation methods per image.</p
<p>The execution time of the three methods against different numbers of new data points.</p
<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p
<p>Comparison of the computation speed for the Improved SIFT and the Original SIFT.</p
<p>A comparison between numerical and exact solutions at different time levels.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>Comparison of time and computing resources used by the compared binning methods.</p
<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
<p>Comparison of running time (seconds) of the algorithms implemented in MATLAB (upper section) and ...
<p>Computation Time (In CPU Seconds) For Different Methods With Different Noise Densities.</p
<p>Comparison of encryption time between our proposed method and some other cryptosystems.</p
<p>A comparison between the average processing time of different segmentation methods per image.</p
<p>The execution time of the three methods against different numbers of new data points.</p
<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p
<p>Comparison of the computation speed for the Improved SIFT and the Original SIFT.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG