<p>For all the cases the <i>x</i>- and <i>y</i>-axis indicate accessions under comparison (B73, PT or OAXA). Each dot represents a TE subfamily, with the regression (<i>y</i>) and correlations (<i>r<sup>2</sup></i>) between accessions indicated. The solid line represents the regression fit, while the dashed line represents the null hypothesis. The color of the dots represents significance: red dots are significant differences between accessions at a FDR of <i>q</i><0.001, based on the χ<sup>2</sup><sub>Corr</sub> in panel a and the χ<sup>2</sup><sub>Prop</sub> for panels b and c. Blue dots are not significant.</p
<p>The statistical tests were carried out between <i>trnH</i>–<i>psbA</i> and the other three single...
(A) Comparison of predictive performance for each gene (R2) between each pair of populations. Predic...
<p>Neighbor-joining tree based on nuclear SSR data compared with the percentage of membership for th...
<p>The pairwise comparisons between accessions (B73, PT and OAXA) are indicated on the figure. The b...
<p>Correlation analysis between A-D and At-Dt comparisons for each allotetraploid accession.</p
<div><p>A: Modified RC probability comparison of V3 and V4 (for rarefied data). Each dot represents ...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of approaches for rational siRNA desig...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Results of pairwise analysis of all cell line samples broken out into technical and bi...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Rank Difference Analysis of Microarrays (RDAM), a...
<p>a) Histograms of the RPKM of TEs (left) and RNA elements, based on genomic reads. b) The empirica...
<p>ASD for each locus compared with mutation rates for each locus, using three published studies. A)...
Each dot corresponds to the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) for disease index of one of the 19...
A<p>BLS = Bacterial leaf streak, PTR 1 = <i>Pyrenophora tritici-repentis</i> race 1, PTR 5 = <...
<p>Scatterplots of mean peak disease scores (MPDS) for blepharitis (A) and stromal keratitis (B) ver...
<p>Comparison of gene set -log10 p-values from the CD data competitive gene-set analysis at differen...
<p>The statistical tests were carried out between <i>trnH</i>–<i>psbA</i> and the other three single...
(A) Comparison of predictive performance for each gene (R2) between each pair of populations. Predic...
<p>Neighbor-joining tree based on nuclear SSR data compared with the percentage of membership for th...
<p>The pairwise comparisons between accessions (B73, PT and OAXA) are indicated on the figure. The b...
<p>Correlation analysis between A-D and At-Dt comparisons for each allotetraploid accession.</p
<div><p>A: Modified RC probability comparison of V3 and V4 (for rarefied data). Each dot represents ...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of approaches for rational siRNA desig...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Results of pairwise analysis of all cell line samples broken out into technical and bi...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Rank Difference Analysis of Microarrays (RDAM), a...
<p>a) Histograms of the RPKM of TEs (left) and RNA elements, based on genomic reads. b) The empirica...
<p>ASD for each locus compared with mutation rates for each locus, using three published studies. A)...
Each dot corresponds to the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) for disease index of one of the 19...
A<p>BLS = Bacterial leaf streak, PTR 1 = <i>Pyrenophora tritici-repentis</i> race 1, PTR 5 = <...
<p>Scatterplots of mean peak disease scores (MPDS) for blepharitis (A) and stromal keratitis (B) ver...
<p>Comparison of gene set -log10 p-values from the CD data competitive gene-set analysis at differen...
<p>The statistical tests were carried out between <i>trnH</i>–<i>psbA</i> and the other three single...
(A) Comparison of predictive performance for each gene (R2) between each pair of populations. Predic...
<p>Neighbor-joining tree based on nuclear SSR data compared with the percentage of membership for th...