<p>Power comparison between the four exact testing procedures for N = 20, 30, 50, 80, and 100 from row 1 to row 5, respectively.</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
Researchers often face the problem of accurately calculating the power for tests of differences betw...
<p>These plots show the power comparisons between the methods while changing the γ<sub>1</sub> with ...
<p>Unit-based and marker-based powers are tested on CNA amplifications, and the values for each para...
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
<p>Test power at the significance level of 0.05 for four methods in Scenarios B3–B9.</p
<p>Each line shows the power vs size for a different test statistic; the univariate tests ( and ANOV...
A comparison of recalculated power spectra observables from results of the two extraction methods.</...
Comparison results of FDS and PIS in 10,000 pairs of random electricity processes using 70%, 80%, an...
a<p>compared with group A, P<0.05;</p>b<p>compared with group B, <i>P</i><0.05.</p
<p>Comparison of <i>TPAP</i> results at various scales of <i>m</i> (<i>N</i> = 10,000).</p
A method of power assessment for the problem of comparing several treatments with a control is consi...
<p>Comparison curves of average power for all algorithms with number of iterations.</p
<p>(a) Measured power losses from Test 1A repeatability tests at 90°C. (b) Theoretical power loss ca...
Some FWE-Type multiple comparisons procedures are compared in terms of power and percentage of corre...
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
Researchers often face the problem of accurately calculating the power for tests of differences betw...
<p>These plots show the power comparisons between the methods while changing the γ<sub>1</sub> with ...
<p>Unit-based and marker-based powers are tested on CNA amplifications, and the values for each para...
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
<p>Test power at the significance level of 0.05 for four methods in Scenarios B3–B9.</p
<p>Each line shows the power vs size for a different test statistic; the univariate tests ( and ANOV...
A comparison of recalculated power spectra observables from results of the two extraction methods.</...
Comparison results of FDS and PIS in 10,000 pairs of random electricity processes using 70%, 80%, an...
a<p>compared with group A, P<0.05;</p>b<p>compared with group B, <i>P</i><0.05.</p
<p>Comparison of <i>TPAP</i> results at various scales of <i>m</i> (<i>N</i> = 10,000).</p
A method of power assessment for the problem of comparing several treatments with a control is consi...
<p>Comparison curves of average power for all algorithms with number of iterations.</p
<p>(a) Measured power losses from Test 1A repeatability tests at 90°C. (b) Theoretical power loss ca...
Some FWE-Type multiple comparisons procedures are compared in terms of power and percentage of corre...
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
Researchers often face the problem of accurately calculating the power for tests of differences betw...
<p>These plots show the power comparisons between the methods while changing the γ<sub>1</sub> with ...
DOI
Add to ORKG