<p>The top panel depicts results with the original crystal structures used rigidly, with a red line indicating the Dscore+>1.3 cutoff used in this work. The top Dscore+ value is shown for each of the 27 protein targets (17 druggable and 10 difficult, where the prodrug targets are considered difficult). The bottom panel depicts results after modeling of protein flexibility, with difficult targets in ghost outline because flexibility modeling is not usually applied to sites that score below the Dscore+>1.3 cutoff. Difficult targets are indicated by the lighter bars, while druggable targets are indicated by the darker bars. See text for further discussion.</p
<p>Dscore values, volume sizes, hydrophilic and hydrophobic areas of the five binding sites in three...
<p>Panels (a) to (e) show the prediction examples of five proteins from S48b testing set with MCC of...
ABSTRACT: Druggability assessment of a target protein has emerged in recent years as an important co...
<p>These targets have <u>protein-protein</u> co-crystal structures shown in the top half of the tabl...
<p>Targets are from <i>Huang and Jacobson</i><a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>The “Structures” column provides the number of unique PDB entries represented, and “Proteins” rep...
Judging if a protein is able to bind orally available molecules with high affinity, i.e. if a protei...
<p>A) Protein surface, B) valid binding site, and C) invalid binding site frequencies, and D) valid ...
<p>(A-C), druggable sites (Dscore values ≥ 0.83) in 25 representative conformations. Consensus bindi...
Advances reported over the last few years and the increasing availability of protein crystal structu...
<p>A) Binding site definition of Zif268 protein based on different distance cutoffs. ‘+’ marks the b...
Predicting druggability and prioritising certain disease modifying targets is critical in drug disco...
(A) The propensities for surface or buried residues; . Black and gray bars denote surface and buried...
<p>(A). Standard deviation of phi and psi angles of the residues of the receptor within 7 Å of ligan...
We have developed a new computational algorithm for de novo identification of protein-ligand bindin...
<p>Dscore values, volume sizes, hydrophilic and hydrophobic areas of the five binding sites in three...
<p>Panels (a) to (e) show the prediction examples of five proteins from S48b testing set with MCC of...
ABSTRACT: Druggability assessment of a target protein has emerged in recent years as an important co...
<p>These targets have <u>protein-protein</u> co-crystal structures shown in the top half of the tabl...
<p>Targets are from <i>Huang and Jacobson</i><a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>The “Structures” column provides the number of unique PDB entries represented, and “Proteins” rep...
Judging if a protein is able to bind orally available molecules with high affinity, i.e. if a protei...
<p>A) Protein surface, B) valid binding site, and C) invalid binding site frequencies, and D) valid ...
<p>(A-C), druggable sites (Dscore values ≥ 0.83) in 25 representative conformations. Consensus bindi...
Advances reported over the last few years and the increasing availability of protein crystal structu...
<p>A) Binding site definition of Zif268 protein based on different distance cutoffs. ‘+’ marks the b...
Predicting druggability and prioritising certain disease modifying targets is critical in drug disco...
(A) The propensities for surface or buried residues; . Black and gray bars denote surface and buried...
<p>(A). Standard deviation of phi and psi angles of the residues of the receptor within 7 Å of ligan...
We have developed a new computational algorithm for de novo identification of protein-ligand bindin...
<p>Dscore values, volume sizes, hydrophilic and hydrophobic areas of the five binding sites in three...
<p>Panels (a) to (e) show the prediction examples of five proteins from S48b testing set with MCC of...
ABSTRACT: Druggability assessment of a target protein has emerged in recent years as an important co...