-a<p>Newcastle-Ottawa Quality assessment scale not applicable (study design: randomized trial, higher level of evidence as compared to observational studies <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0112017#pone.0112017-Oxford1" target="_blank">[60]</a>.</p><p>Source of data, method of death ascertainment or confirmation and quality assessment of the included studies.</p
<p>RB, “Risk of Bias”; Manual for assigning “yes”, “unclear,” and “no” available in Appendix B in <a...
Importance: In aetiological research, investigators using death certificate data have traditionally ...
<p><sup>a</sup> Not selected because of potential overlap with Karamanos (2014).</p><p><sup>b</sup> ...
<p>A score of 0 indicates “no”; a score of 1 or 2 indicates “yes”. Studies scoring ≥67% were conside...
<p>S1: Selection1-is the case definition adequate; S2: Selection2-representativeness of the cases; S...
<p>‘Y’ denotes ‘yes’ and ‘N’ denotes ‘no’. Quality items: 1) Definition of case; 2) Representativene...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
Quality assessment: The Newcastle Ottawa Scale [NOS] for assessing the quality of nonrandomized stud...
<p>NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale; N.of P.,number of patients; Cutoff of V.,cutoff o...
<p>Note: For case-control studies, 1 indicates adequate definition of cases; 2, cases are representa...
Aims: To identify instruments that could assess the quality of dying and death and their psychometri...
<p>Quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa scale (n = 9)...
<p>a The outcome assessors were not blinded to the interventions implemented in any of the studies.<...
<p>Note: “1”represented got 1 star</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies using Newcastle-Otta...
Introduction: Coded cause of death data from death certificates is important for estimating mortalit...
<p>RB, “Risk of Bias”; Manual for assigning “yes”, “unclear,” and “no” available in Appendix B in <a...
Importance: In aetiological research, investigators using death certificate data have traditionally ...
<p><sup>a</sup> Not selected because of potential overlap with Karamanos (2014).</p><p><sup>b</sup> ...
<p>A score of 0 indicates “no”; a score of 1 or 2 indicates “yes”. Studies scoring ≥67% were conside...
<p>S1: Selection1-is the case definition adequate; S2: Selection2-representativeness of the cases; S...
<p>‘Y’ denotes ‘yes’ and ‘N’ denotes ‘no’. Quality items: 1) Definition of case; 2) Representativene...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
Quality assessment: The Newcastle Ottawa Scale [NOS] for assessing the quality of nonrandomized stud...
<p>NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale; N.of P.,number of patients; Cutoff of V.,cutoff o...
<p>Note: For case-control studies, 1 indicates adequate definition of cases; 2, cases are representa...
Aims: To identify instruments that could assess the quality of dying and death and their psychometri...
<p>Quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa scale (n = 9)...
<p>a The outcome assessors were not blinded to the interventions implemented in any of the studies.<...
<p>Note: “1”represented got 1 star</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies using Newcastle-Otta...
Introduction: Coded cause of death data from death certificates is important for estimating mortalit...
<p>RB, “Risk of Bias”; Manual for assigning “yes”, “unclear,” and “no” available in Appendix B in <a...
Importance: In aetiological research, investigators using death certificate data have traditionally ...
<p><sup>a</sup> Not selected because of potential overlap with Karamanos (2014).</p><p><sup>b</sup> ...