<p>For each covariate a separate model was run. NS: non-significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05). S: significant (P ≤ 0.05) with +: positive relationship,-: negative relationship, *: inclusion of the significant covariate rendered the original vegetation type or herbivore exclusion treatment effect non-significant.</p><p>Summary of effects of adding covariates to initial models with a significant vegetation type effect (A) or with a significant herbivore exclusion treatment effect (B).</p
Summary of covariance components for the random effects of site and species on leaf trait relationsh...
<p>Results of mixed effects models testing the effects of sampling period, landscape characteristics...
Supplementary note on covariate-specific attenuation of effect sizes in basic model.</p
<p>Covariates included in the final model (see text) for each species showing statistical significan...
<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as si...
<p>Models account for sampling date and covariate factors relating to plant size and pre-treatment d...
Model results for the three yield variables in Year 1 against treatments or Plant Health (Percentage...
<p>Habitat covariates contributing most to attract each group of species are highlighted in bold.</p...
<p>The number next to the arrows indicate respective model with significant results.</p
<p>Cell entries marked with by ‘+’ symbols represent significant increases (<i>P</i> < 0.025) with p...
<p>Observations (circles) and model predictions (lines) are shown for every combination of response ...
<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as si...
These are testing the effects of the experimental treatments on the pathogens, LBAM, plant health, s...
<p>Given are separate models for tansy biomass, the log response ratio (plant biomass LogRR) of tans...
<p>Alternative models were fitted with single predictor variables. Listed are AIC and Chi<sup>2</sup...
Summary of covariance components for the random effects of site and species on leaf trait relationsh...
<p>Results of mixed effects models testing the effects of sampling period, landscape characteristics...
Supplementary note on covariate-specific attenuation of effect sizes in basic model.</p
<p>Covariates included in the final model (see text) for each species showing statistical significan...
<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as si...
<p>Models account for sampling date and covariate factors relating to plant size and pre-treatment d...
Model results for the three yield variables in Year 1 against treatments or Plant Health (Percentage...
<p>Habitat covariates contributing most to attract each group of species are highlighted in bold.</p...
<p>The number next to the arrows indicate respective model with significant results.</p
<p>Cell entries marked with by ‘+’ symbols represent significant increases (<i>P</i> < 0.025) with p...
<p>Observations (circles) and model predictions (lines) are shown for every combination of response ...
<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as si...
These are testing the effects of the experimental treatments on the pathogens, LBAM, plant health, s...
<p>Given are separate models for tansy biomass, the log response ratio (plant biomass LogRR) of tans...
<p>Alternative models were fitted with single predictor variables. Listed are AIC and Chi<sup>2</sup...
Summary of covariance components for the random effects of site and species on leaf trait relationsh...
<p>Results of mixed effects models testing the effects of sampling period, landscape characteristics...
Supplementary note on covariate-specific attenuation of effect sizes in basic model.</p