<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as single variable nor in the interactions. The final model is presented.</p
<p>CN data are presented as mean values per study site and treatment. Points symbolise the study sit...
<p>Given are separate models for tansy biomass, the log response ratio (plant biomass LogRR) of tans...
<p>Reduced mixed-effects model retaining significant predictors of facility delivery (N = 572).</p
<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as si...
Model results for the three yield variables in Year 1 against treatments or Plant Health (Percentage...
These are testing the effects of the experimental treatments on the pathogens, LBAM, plant health, s...
Result for models of two of the yield variables in Year 2 against pathogen variables. These are the ...
<p>Models account for sampling date and covariate factors relating to plant size and pre-treatment d...
<p>Individual-specific (i.e. random) intercepts and slopes were included in all models, while non-si...
<p>The mean value of logit-transformed proportion of sites with cessation of breeding is given for c...
<p>Results of linear mixed effects models testing precipitation change (PC) and functional group (FG...
<p>Parameter estimates from the best-fitting mixed effects model used to evaluate the relative influ...
<p>The models assumed a normally distributed response with grass height log-transformed. Transect wa...
<p>* Data from examination at baseline and after washout period combined.</p>#<p><i>p</i>-values les...
<p>The estimates of the variables in the minimal models (linear mixed effects models) investigating ...
<p>CN data are presented as mean values per study site and treatment. Points symbolise the study sit...
<p>Given are separate models for tansy biomass, the log response ratio (plant biomass LogRR) of tans...
<p>Reduced mixed-effects model retaining significant predictors of facility delivery (N = 572).</p
<p>The explanatory variable treatment was removed from the model as it was neither significant as si...
Model results for the three yield variables in Year 1 against treatments or Plant Health (Percentage...
These are testing the effects of the experimental treatments on the pathogens, LBAM, plant health, s...
Result for models of two of the yield variables in Year 2 against pathogen variables. These are the ...
<p>Models account for sampling date and covariate factors relating to plant size and pre-treatment d...
<p>Individual-specific (i.e. random) intercepts and slopes were included in all models, while non-si...
<p>The mean value of logit-transformed proportion of sites with cessation of breeding is given for c...
<p>Results of linear mixed effects models testing precipitation change (PC) and functional group (FG...
<p>Parameter estimates from the best-fitting mixed effects model used to evaluate the relative influ...
<p>The models assumed a normally distributed response with grass height log-transformed. Transect wa...
<p>* Data from examination at baseline and after washout period combined.</p>#<p><i>p</i>-values les...
<p>The estimates of the variables in the minimal models (linear mixed effects models) investigating ...
<p>CN data are presented as mean values per study site and treatment. Points symbolise the study sit...
<p>Given are separate models for tansy biomass, the log response ratio (plant biomass LogRR) of tans...
<p>Reduced mixed-effects model retaining significant predictors of facility delivery (N = 572).</p
DOI
Add to ORKG