<p>Note:—no star † cohort study ‡ case-control study</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies.</p
Study quality assessment of included studies, in accordance with the Framework of Potential Biases [...
Quality assessment of included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p
The included studies were assessed according to STROBE checklist and awarded scores, which are prese...
<p>Quality assessment of included case-control, RCT, and longitudinal studies.</p
<p>Quality evaluation of included studies (n = 68) according to reported clinical data.</p
<p>Quality assessment of included studies: Risk of bias (A) and overall assessment of risk of bias (...
*<p>1 indicates case definition and diagnostic appropriate; 2, consecutive patients or case having a...
<p>Quality Assessment of Included Randomized Controlled Trials <i>(n = 22)</i>.</p
<p>Note: “1”represented got 1 star</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies using Newcastle-Otta...
<p><i>0–3 low quality</i></p><p><i>4–5 intermediate quality</i></p><p><i>6–7 high quality</i></p><p>...
<p>Assessment of quality of all included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis.</p
<p>Methodological quality of included observational studies (stars assigned to respective study).</p
<p><i>Note,</i> * = rated as meeting the quality criterion, - = rated as not meeting the quality cri...
Quality assessment of the included studies based on the quality in Prognosis Studies tool.</p
<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoin...
Study quality assessment of included studies, in accordance with the Framework of Potential Biases [...
Quality assessment of included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p
The included studies were assessed according to STROBE checklist and awarded scores, which are prese...
<p>Quality assessment of included case-control, RCT, and longitudinal studies.</p
<p>Quality evaluation of included studies (n = 68) according to reported clinical data.</p
<p>Quality assessment of included studies: Risk of bias (A) and overall assessment of risk of bias (...
*<p>1 indicates case definition and diagnostic appropriate; 2, consecutive patients or case having a...
<p>Quality Assessment of Included Randomized Controlled Trials <i>(n = 22)</i>.</p
<p>Note: “1”represented got 1 star</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies using Newcastle-Otta...
<p><i>0–3 low quality</i></p><p><i>4–5 intermediate quality</i></p><p><i>6–7 high quality</i></p><p>...
<p>Assessment of quality of all included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis.</p
<p>Methodological quality of included observational studies (stars assigned to respective study).</p
<p><i>Note,</i> * = rated as meeting the quality criterion, - = rated as not meeting the quality cri...
Quality assessment of the included studies based on the quality in Prognosis Studies tool.</p
<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoin...
Study quality assessment of included studies, in accordance with the Framework of Potential Biases [...
Quality assessment of included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p
The included studies were assessed according to STROBE checklist and awarded scores, which are prese...
DOI
Add to ORKG