<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD</p><p>*Statistically significant difference.</p><p>FA values measured at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the SNHL group were compared with the control group.</p><p>Summary of FA values at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG in the SNHL and control groups.</p
<p><i>FMR1</i> mRNA was normalised to either <b>(A)</b> <i>GUS</i> alone; <b>(B)</b> 3IC (<i>GUS</i>...
<p>The comparisons of histopathology scores among five experimental groups (*Significant difference ...
* Significant difference vs. INF group, † Significant difference vs. Sham group.</p
<p>Values are presented as mean±SD</p><p>*Statistically significant difference.</p><p>FA values meas...
<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD; MD values measured at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the ...
<p>Results expressed as pg/ml of TNF-α in the BALF. Difference in the variance of the two groups is ...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.</p><p><sup>a</sup> Significantly different from ...
<p>Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Bold text indicates the clinical parameters that have sho...
<p>Statistical comparison between the two groups. Significance level at p = 0.01. In brackets the st...
<p>Mean FA values were calculated from the three measurements of the three subjects in each region i...
<p>AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GLDH, glutamate dehydrogenase.</p><p>Normally distributed values...
<p>Comparisons of plasma levels of TF and TFPI between subjects from the study and control group (Ma...
<p>Significant P values were shown in bold.</p><p>Subgroup analyses for studies investigating FA val...
<p>All parts display voxels showing abnormal FA and MD on TBSS skeleton. Statistically significant g...
<p>Note: Difference are significant when <i>p<</i>0.05 level.</p>D,T<p>A significant difference with...
<p><i>FMR1</i> mRNA was normalised to either <b>(A)</b> <i>GUS</i> alone; <b>(B)</b> 3IC (<i>GUS</i>...
<p>The comparisons of histopathology scores among five experimental groups (*Significant difference ...
* Significant difference vs. INF group, † Significant difference vs. Sham group.</p
<p>Values are presented as mean±SD</p><p>*Statistically significant difference.</p><p>FA values meas...
<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD; MD values measured at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the ...
<p>Results expressed as pg/ml of TNF-α in the BALF. Difference in the variance of the two groups is ...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.</p><p><sup>a</sup> Significantly different from ...
<p>Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Bold text indicates the clinical parameters that have sho...
<p>Statistical comparison between the two groups. Significance level at p = 0.01. In brackets the st...
<p>Mean FA values were calculated from the three measurements of the three subjects in each region i...
<p>AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GLDH, glutamate dehydrogenase.</p><p>Normally distributed values...
<p>Comparisons of plasma levels of TF and TFPI between subjects from the study and control group (Ma...
<p>Significant P values were shown in bold.</p><p>Subgroup analyses for studies investigating FA val...
<p>All parts display voxels showing abnormal FA and MD on TBSS skeleton. Statistically significant g...
<p>Note: Difference are significant when <i>p<</i>0.05 level.</p>D,T<p>A significant difference with...
<p><i>FMR1</i> mRNA was normalised to either <b>(A)</b> <i>GUS</i> alone; <b>(B)</b> 3IC (<i>GUS</i>...
<p>The comparisons of histopathology scores among five experimental groups (*Significant difference ...
* Significant difference vs. INF group, † Significant difference vs. Sham group.</p