<p>Values are presented as mean±SD</p><p>*Statistically significant difference.</p><p>FA values measured at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the good outcome group of SNHL patients were compared with the poor group.</p><p>Summary of FA values at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the good/ poor outcome group of SNHL patients.</p
Univariate analysis of patients with high and low systolic and diastolic ARV between good and poor o...
<p>Summary measure is n (%) for all categorical characteristics.</p><p>(*). Scar or parent report.</...
Comparison of baseline characteristics of subjects with risk factors for NAFLD categorized according...
<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD</p><p>*Statistically significant difference.</p><p>FA values me...
<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD; MD values measured at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the ...
Comparison of Clinical Features of Patients with SFTS in the Survival and Death Subgroups of the Mod...
<p>The p-values indicate whether the differences in proportions between good, moderate and bad HRQoL...
<p>There was a statistically significant difference across all groups of patients except for patient...
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the survivor and non-survivor groups.</p
<p>Numerical data are expressed as median (range) for histology and CIBDAI and as mean (± SD) for re...
<p>*The differences between the deteriorated renal function group and the stable group were statisti...
<p>Mean FA values were calculated from the three measurements of the three subjects in each region i...
<p>Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Bold text indicates the clinical parameters that have sho...
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the HPE and AP groups.</p
Comparison of demographics, comorbid conditions and clinical symptoms of SFTS patients in the surviv...
Univariate analysis of patients with high and low systolic and diastolic ARV between good and poor o...
<p>Summary measure is n (%) for all categorical characteristics.</p><p>(*). Scar or parent report.</...
Comparison of baseline characteristics of subjects with risk factors for NAFLD categorized according...
<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD</p><p>*Statistically significant difference.</p><p>FA values me...
<p>Values are presented as mean ± SD; MD values measured at the TB, SON, IC, MGB, AR and WHG of the ...
Comparison of Clinical Features of Patients with SFTS in the Survival and Death Subgroups of the Mod...
<p>The p-values indicate whether the differences in proportions between good, moderate and bad HRQoL...
<p>There was a statistically significant difference across all groups of patients except for patient...
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the survivor and non-survivor groups.</p
<p>Numerical data are expressed as median (range) for histology and CIBDAI and as mean (± SD) for re...
<p>*The differences between the deteriorated renal function group and the stable group were statisti...
<p>Mean FA values were calculated from the three measurements of the three subjects in each region i...
<p>Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Bold text indicates the clinical parameters that have sho...
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the HPE and AP groups.</p
Comparison of demographics, comorbid conditions and clinical symptoms of SFTS patients in the surviv...
Univariate analysis of patients with high and low systolic and diastolic ARV between good and poor o...
<p>Summary measure is n (%) for all categorical characteristics.</p><p>(*). Scar or parent report.</...
Comparison of baseline characteristics of subjects with risk factors for NAFLD categorized according...