<p><b><i>Bottom Panel</i></b>: Sample of the experimental protocol. This included a baseline phase where participants judged the pointing direction of test hands at 5 orientations 0°, 0.75° right, 0.75° left, 1.5° right, 1.5° left. Followed by a long adaptation phase where participants viewed a series of adaptors (either hands or arrows). The long adaptation period, ~ 4mins, was immediately followed by a post-adapt top up and test block. Each top up adaptor—left and right hands (<i>same-adaptation)</i> or arrows (<i>cross-adaptation</i>) pointing 10° left or right of the skillet—was presented for 6000ms followed by a test stimulus for 400ms.</p
<p>The first possibility is that matching the direction of the adapting and test stimuli leads to gr...
<p>One can experience the tilt after-effect (TAE) obtained with single polarity line adaptors (<b>A<...
<p>(A-C) Posture conditions. Upper vs. lower row: uncrossed vs. crossed hand conditions. Dotted line...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b><i>Bottom Panel</i></b>: Mean difference in the percentage of direc...
<p>In (a), the order of all experimental conditions and respective numbers of trials used are shown....
<p>Examples of the test heads at angles of 4° and 2° left, 0°, 2° and 4° right (bottom panel) and of...
(A) An example of a standard trial in Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 6. Participants viewed a single Gabor...
<p>Landmarks (LM) were presented in combination with an arrow pointing either left, straight or righ...
<p>The leftmost panel shows a typical stimulus set (in this case a counterclockwise tilted target wi...
<p><b><i>A</i></b>: Training schedules of the three visuomotor adaptation experimental groups. Note ...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b>Bottom Panel</b>: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahe...
The experiment consisted of two sessions: Training (24 trials) and Test (48 × 8 trials). In the Trai...
Of the many hand gestures that we use in communication pointing is one of the most common and powerf...
<p>Panel A shows a top view of the experimental setup. In this figure, the subject is shown performi...
<p>Hand movement (H), the starting position (SP) and the target (T) are shown for each condition. Vi...
<p>The first possibility is that matching the direction of the adapting and test stimuli leads to gr...
<p>One can experience the tilt after-effect (TAE) obtained with single polarity line adaptors (<b>A<...
<p>(A-C) Posture conditions. Upper vs. lower row: uncrossed vs. crossed hand conditions. Dotted line...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b><i>Bottom Panel</i></b>: Mean difference in the percentage of direc...
<p>In (a), the order of all experimental conditions and respective numbers of trials used are shown....
<p>Examples of the test heads at angles of 4° and 2° left, 0°, 2° and 4° right (bottom panel) and of...
(A) An example of a standard trial in Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 6. Participants viewed a single Gabor...
<p>Landmarks (LM) were presented in combination with an arrow pointing either left, straight or righ...
<p>The leftmost panel shows a typical stimulus set (in this case a counterclockwise tilted target wi...
<p><b><i>A</i></b>: Training schedules of the three visuomotor adaptation experimental groups. Note ...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b>Bottom Panel</b>: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahe...
The experiment consisted of two sessions: Training (24 trials) and Test (48 × 8 trials). In the Trai...
Of the many hand gestures that we use in communication pointing is one of the most common and powerf...
<p>Panel A shows a top view of the experimental setup. In this figure, the subject is shown performi...
<p>Hand movement (H), the starting position (SP) and the target (T) are shown for each condition. Vi...
<p>The first possibility is that matching the direction of the adapting and test stimuli leads to gr...
<p>One can experience the tilt after-effect (TAE) obtained with single polarity line adaptors (<b>A<...
<p>(A-C) Posture conditions. Upper vs. lower row: uncrossed vs. crossed hand conditions. Dotted line...